SPRING W. Cheng Internet Draft R. Han Intended status: Standards Track China Mobile Expires: May 02, 2025 C. Lin Y. Qiu New H3C Technologies G. Zhang China Mobile November 03, 2024 Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dhcp-04 Abstract In an SRv6 network, each SRv6 Segment Endpoint Node must be assigned an SRv6 locator, and segment IDs are generated within the address space of this SRv6 locator. This document describes a method for assigning SRv6 locators to SRv6 Segment Endpoint Nodes through DHCPv6. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on May 02, 2025. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Cheng, et al. Expire May, 2025 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction...................................................2 1.1. Requirements Language.....................................3 2. Terminology....................................................3 3. Scenario for SRv6 Locator......................................4 4. DHCPv6 extension...............................................6 4.1. Identity Association for SRv6 Locator Option..............6 4.2. IA SRv6 Locator Option....................................8 5. Process of Assigning SRv6 Locator.............................10 5.1.1. DHCP Client Behavior................................10 5.1.2. DHCP Server Behavior................................11 5.1.3. DHCP Relay Agent Behavior...........................12 6. Implementation Status.........................................13 6.1. New H3C Technologies.....................................14 6.2. Raisecom Corporation.....................................14 7. IANA Considerations...........................................15 8. Security Considerations.......................................15 9. Privacy Considerations........................................16 10. Acknowledgements.............................................16 11. References...................................................16 11.1. Normative References....................................16 11.2. Informative References..................................17 Authors' Addresses...............................................18 1. Introduction Segment Routing (SR) [RFC8402] allows a node to steer a packet flow along any path. The headend is a node where the instructions for source routing (i.e., segments) are written into the packet. It hence becomes the starting node for a specific segment routing path. Intermediate per-path states are eliminated thanks to source routing. A Segment Routing Policy (SR Policy) [RFC8402] is an ordered list of segments (i.e., instructions) that represent a source-routed policy. The headend node is said to steer a flow into an SR Policy. The packets steered into an SR Policy have an ordered list of segments associated with that SR Policy written into them. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 [RFC8402] defines an SRv6 Segment Identifier (SID) as an IPv6 address explicitly associated with the segment. When an SRv6 SID is in the Destination Address field of an IPv6 header of a packet, it is routed through transit nodes in an IPv6 network as an IPv6 address. An SRv6 SID [RFC8986] is as consisting of LOC:FUNCT:ARG, where a locator (LOC) is encoded in the L most significant bits of the SID, followed by F bits of function (FUNCT) and A bits of arguments (ARG). L, the locator length, is flexible, and an operator is free to use the locator length of their choice. F and A may be any value as long as L+F+A <= 128. A locator may be represented as B:N where B is the SRv6 SID block (IPv6 prefix allocated for SRv6 SIDs by the operator) and N is the identifier of the parent node instantiating the SID. When the LOC part of the SRv6 SIDs is routable, it leads to the node, which instantiates the SID. The SRv6 locator can be distributed to other IPv6 nodes within the SRv6 domain through IGP advertisement. This allows other nodes to learn the locator's route. The SRv6 Segment Endpoint Node then allocates SIDs with various behaviors based on its locator. In IP network customer provider edge (CPE) devices often do not support an IGP protocol, which makes it impossible to advertise SRv6 locator routes for SRv6 Segment Endpoint Nodes through IGP. In such scenarios, SIDs can only be configured manually on CPEs, and SRv6 Locator routes can only be statically distributed. To address this issue, this document proposes a method of dynamically assigning SRv6 locators to SRv6 Segment Endpoint Nodes through DHCPv6. It follows the existing process of DHCPv6, simplifying the allocation of SRv6 locators and route distribution. 1.1. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 2. Terminology This document leverages the terms defined in [RFC8415] and [RFC8986]. The reader is assumed to be familiar with this terminology. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 3. Scenario for SRv6 Locator Telecom providers can use its IP Metro and Backbone networks to establish connectivity between access users who are located in different regions. As shown in Figure 1, in the IP backbone network, access network devices (CPE) are deployed for access users in different regions. This deployment assumes that all of the relevant components in Figure 1 are part of a single trusted SR domain. The CPE must be operator-managed and is only applicable when different arms of the same company operate their portions of the network separately, but must trust each other. Metropolitan area network +---------------------------+ | | +------+ +------+ | +-----+ +------+ | |Host1 +-----+ CPE1 +----+--+BRAS1+--------+ CR1 | | +------+ +------+ | +-----+ +---+--+ | | | | +---------------------+-----+ | +--------+-------------+ | | | Backbone Network | | | +--------+-------------+ | +---------------------+-----+ | | | +------+ +------+ | +-----+ +--+---+ | |Host2 +-----+ CPE2 +----+--+BRAS2+---------+ CR2 | | +------+ +------+ | +-----+ +------+ | +---------------------------+ Figure 1: Telecom IPv6 Network CPEs for access users are connected to the local metropolitan area network (MAN) in various ways. CPEs are responsible for assigning addresses to access users, so CPEs apply for DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation (PD) from a DHCPv6 server. The DHCPv6 server is usually enabled on the BRAS. After the DHCPv6 server allocates PD, BRAS will add a network route corresponding to PD to local routing table and distribute the network route to the upstream routers. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 In this network, operators hope to achieve interconnection between access users through End-to-End SRv6 tunnels. Taking the service traffic from Host1 to Host2 as an example, CPE1 is the SRv6 ingress node and CPE2 is the SRv6 egress node. The SRv6 locator should be configured on CPE. Other devices in the network learn the SRv6 locator route of the CPE. At the same time, SRv6 policies needs to be configured on CPEs to steer the service traffic between CPEs to the specified SRv6 forwarding path. The SRv6 policy can be manually configured statically or issued through the controller, and its specific configuration method is out of the scope of this document. However, due to the following reasons, it is difficult to achieve these requirements currently. * The configuration is very complex. In Metro network, the number of CPEs is very large and widely distributed geographically. Moreover, the mobility requirements of CPE are relatively high, and the access location of the same CPE often changes, so its IPv6 address cannot be fixed. At present, an SRv6 locator can only be configured on each CPE through a controller or the Command Line Interface (CLI), which increases the configuration complexity. * SRv6 Locator routes cannot be dynamically distributed. CPE can be connected to the Broadband Remote Access Server (BRAS) of local MAN through various types of networks, such as leased line, optical fiber, etc. Due to the diversity of connections, IGP is usually only enabled within the MAN, that is, IGP will not be deployed between CPE and BRAS. As a result, the SRv6 locator route of CPE could not be distributed to the BRAS node through IGP, and the static route can only be configured manually on the BRAS or the controller. However, CPE and BRAS often belong to different administration domains. Configuring routes to CPE on BRAS increases the cost and workload of communication and coordination. To solve these difficulties this document proposes a method to allocate SRv6 locators to CPE through DHCPv6 and distribute SRv6 locator routes by using the workflow of DHCPv6. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 4. DHCPv6 extension 4.1. Identity Association for SRv6 Locator Option The Identify Association for SRv6 Locator (IA_SRV6_LOCATOR) option is used to carry an IA_SRV6_LOCATOR, the parameters associated with the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR, and the SRv6 locator associated with the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR. The format of the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option is: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | OPTION_IA_SRV6_LOCATOR | Option-Len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IAID (4 octets) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | T1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | T2 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ . . . IA_SRV6_LOCATOR-Options . . . +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 2: Identify Association for SRv6 Locator Option Format Where: - Option-Code: OPTION_IA_SRV6_LOCATOR, the option code for the Identify Association for SRv6 Locator. The current value early assigned by IANA is 149. - Option-Len: 12 + length of IA_SRV6_LOCATOR-Options field. - IAID: The unique identifier for this IA_SRV6_LOCATOR. The IAID must be unique among the identifiers for all of this client's IA_SRV6_LOCATORs. The number space for IA_SRV6_LOCATOR IAIDs is separate from the number space for other IA option types (i.e., IA_TA, IA_NA and IA_PD). A 4-octet field containing an unsigned integer. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 - T1: The time interval after which the client should contact the server from which the SRv6 locators in the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR were obtained to extend the lifetimes of the SRv6 locators to the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR. T1 is a time duration relative to the message reception time expressed in units of seconds. A 4-octet field containing an unsigned integer. - T2: The time interval after which the client should contact any available server to extend the lifetimes of the SRv6 locators assigned to the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR. T2 is a time duration relative to the message reception time expressed in units of seconds. A 4- octet field containing an unsigned integer. - IA_SRV6_LOCATOR-Options: Options associated with this IA_SRV6_LOCATOR. A variable-length field (12 octets less than the value in the Option-Len field). The IA_SRV6_LOCATOR-Options field encapsulates those options that are specific to this IA_SRV6_LOCATOR. For example, all of the IA SRv6 Locator options (see Section 4.2) carrying the SRv6 locators associated with this IA_SRV6_LOCATOR are in the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR- Options field. An IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option may only appear in the options area of a DHCP message. A DHCP message may contain multiple IA_SRV6_LOCATOR Options (though each must have a unique IAID). The status of any operations involving this IA_SRV6_LOCATOR is indicated in a Status Code option (see Section 21.13 of [RFC8415]) in the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR-Options field. Note that an IA_SRV6_LOCATOR has no explicit "lifetime" or "lease length" of its own. When the valid lifetimes of all of the SRv6 locators in an IA_SRV6_LOCATOR have expired, the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR can be considered as having expired. T1 and T2 fields are included to give the server explicit control over when a client should contact the server about a specific IA_SRV6_LOCATOR. In a message sent by a client to a server, the T1 and T2 fields SHOULD be set to 0. The server MUST ignore any values in these fields in messages received from a client. In a message sent by a server to a client, the client MUST use the values in the T1 and T2 fields for the T1 and T2 timers, unless values in those fields are 0. The values in the T1 and T2 fields are the number of seconds until T1 and T2. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 The server selects the T1 and T2 times to allow the client to extend the lifetimes of any SRv6 locators in the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR before the lifetimes expire, even if the server is unavailable for some short period of time. Recommended values for T1 and T2 are 0.5 and 0.8 times the shortest preferred lifetime of the SRv6 locators in the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR that the server is willing to extend, respectively. If the time at which the SRv6 locators in an IA_SRV6_LOCATOR are to be renewed is to be left to the discretion of the client, the server sets T1 and T2 to 0. The client MUST follow the rules defined in Section 14.2 of [RFC8415]. If a client receives an IA_SRV6_LOCATOR with T1 greater than T2 and both T1 and T2 are greater than 0, the client discards the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option and processes the remainder of the message as though the server had not included the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option. 4.2. IA SRv6 Locator Option The IA SRv6 Locator option is used to specify an SRv6 locator associated with an IA_SRV6_LOCATOR. The IA SRv6 Locator option MUST be encapsulated in the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR-Options field of an IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option (see Section 4.1). The terms Locator Block and Locator Node correspond to the B and N parts, respectively, of the SRv6 Locator that is defined in Section 3.1 of [RFC8986]. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | OPTION_IALOCATOR | Option-Len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Preferred-lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Valid-lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | LB-Len | LN-Len | Fun-Len | Arg-Len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-| . SRv6-Locator . . (up to 16 octets) . . . +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ . . . IALocator-Options . . . +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 3: IA SRv6 Locator Option Format Where: Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 - Option-code: OPTION_IALOCATOR, the option code for IA SRv6 Locator option. The current value early assigned by IANA is 150. - Option-Len: 28 + length of IALocator-Options field. - Preferred-lifetime: The preferred lifetime for the SRv6 locator in the option, expressed in units of seconds. A value of 0xffffffff represents "infinity" (see Section 7.7 of [RFC8415]). A 4-octet field containing an unsigned integer. - Valid-lifetime: The valid lifetime for the SRv6 locator in the option, expressed in units of seconds. A value of 0xffffffff represents "infinity". A 4-octet field containing an unsigned integer. - LB-Len: SRv6 SID Locator Block (LB) length in bits. A 1-octet unsigned integer. - LN-Len: SRv6 SID locator Node (LN) length in bits. A 1-octet unsigned integer. - Fun-Len: SRv6 SID function (FUNCT) length in bits. A 1-octet unsigned integer. - Arg-Len: SRv6 SID arguments (ARG) length in bits. A 1-octet unsigned integer. - SRv6-Locator: 1-16 octets. This field encodes the SRv6 Locator. The SRv6 Locator is encoded in the minimal number of octets for the given number of bits. Trailing bits MUST be set to zero and ignored when received. - IALocator-Options: Options associated with this SRv6 locator. A variable-length field (28 octets less than the value in the Option-Len field). The SRv6 SID Locator length (LOC-Len) is LB-Len plus LN-Len. The values in the preferred-lifetime and valid-lifetime fields are the number of seconds remaining in each lifetime. The value of 0xffffffff for the preferred lifetime or the valid lifetime is taken to mean "infinity" and should be used carefully. The details about the use of these values for assigned SRv6 locators are the same as the ones specified for prefix delegation in Section 18.2.10.1 of [RFC8415]. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 An IA SRv6 Locator option may appear only in an IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option. More than one IA SRv6 Locator option can appear in a single IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option. The status of any operations involving this IA SRv6 Locator option is indicated in a Status Code option (see Section 21.13 of [RFC8415]) in the IALocator-Options field. 5. Process of Assigning SRv6 Locator This document assumes that a single transaction for all of the IA options required on an interface is used, as recommended in Section 18.1 of [RFC8415]. 5.1.1. DHCP Client Behavior A client uses the Solicit message to discover DHCPv6 servers configured to assign leases or return other configuration parameters on the link to which the client is attached. A client uses Request, Renew, Rebind, Release and Decline messages during the normal lifecycle of SRv6 locator assignment. In a message sent by a client to a server, the preferred-lifetime and valid-lifetime fields SHOULD be set to 0. The server MUST ignore any received values in these lifetime fields. The client SHOULD NOT send an IA SRv6 Locator option with 0 in the "LB-Len" and "LN-Len" fields (and an unspecified value (::) in the "SRv6-Locator" field). The client MAY send non-zero values in the "LB-Len" and "LN-Len" fields, and the unspecified value (::) in the "SRv6-Locator" field to indicate a preference for the size of the SRv6 locator to be assigned. The LOC-Len (LB-Len + LN-Len) hint provided by a client is similar to the prefix-length hint in an IA_PD. Clients and servers are expected to follow the guidance provided in [RFC8168]. The client MUST discard any SRv6 locators for which the preferred lifetime is greater than the valid lifetime. The process of requesting an SRv6 locator is the same as that of requesting prefixes. When requesting an SRv6 locator, the DHCPv6 client sends a request message carrying the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option to the DHCPv6 server. Upon the receipt of a valid reply message with IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option in response to a Solicit with a Rapid Commit option, Request, Confirm, Renew, or Rebind message, the client MUST process the Reply Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 message according to the requirements of Section 18.2.10 of [RFC8415], and configure the assigned SRv6 locator in the client device automatically. After obtaining the SRv6 locator assigned by the DHCPv6 server, how to assign local SRv6 SIDs based on this SRv6 locator, how to use multiple assigned SRv6 locators, and how to advertise these SRv6 SIDs to the rest of the network are not within the scope of this document. If the client uses the assigned SRv6 locator to configure local SRv6 SIDs, the preferred and valid lifetimes of those SRv6 locators MUST NOT be longer than the remaining preferred and valid lifetimes respectively for the assigned SRv6 locator at any time. To extend the preferred and valid lifetimes for the assigned SRv6 locators or obtain new assigned SRv6 locators, the client sends a Renew/Rebind message to the server with IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option as specified in Sections 18.2.4 and 18.2.5 of [RFC8415]. If the client no longer uses the SRv6 locator, the client can actively send a Release message to notify the server to reclaim SRv6 locator and delete the corresponding SRv6 locator. The client MUST include options containing the IAs for the SRv6 locators it is releasing in the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR-options of IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option. A client can explicitly request multiple SRv6 Locator prefixes by sending multiple IA_SRV6_LOCATOR options. A client can send multiple IA_SRV6_LOCATOR options in its initial transmissions. Alternatively, it can send an extra Request message with additional new IA_SRV6_LOCATOR options (or include them in a Renew message). DHCP allows a client to request new SRv6 locators to be assigned by sending additional new IA_SRV6_LOCATOR options. However, a typical operator usually prefers to assign a single, larger prefix. In most deployments, it is recommended that the client request a larger SRv6 locator in its initial transmissions rather than request additional SRv6 locators later on. 5.1.2. DHCP Server Behavior When the server receives a valid Request message or a valid Solicit message with a Rapid Commit option, the server creates the bindings for that client according to the server's policy and configuration information and records the IAs and other information requested by the client. The DHCPv6 server treats the SRv6 locator as the prefix of prefix pool. Upon the receipt of the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option, the server Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 searches SRv6 locator prefix pool and allocates appropriate SRv6 locators for the client. If there is an assignable SRv6 locator, the server creates the SRv6 locator binding entry for that client according to the server's policy and configuration information and constructs a Reply message that includes an IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option with the SRv6 locator information (including LB-Len, LN-Len, Fun-Len, and Arg-Len) assigned to the client. The IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option fills with the SRv6 locator information assigned to the client. The IA SRv6 Locator option populates the SRv6 locator block length, locator node length, function length, and arguments length. Upon receiving the Release message from the client or when the SRv6 locator lease expires, the server reclaims the SRv6 locator prefix resource and deletes the SRv6 locator binding entry. If the BRAS device acts as a DHCPv6 server, the server also MUST delete the corresponding SRv6 locator route locally. For any IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option in the Request message to which the server cannot assign any SRv6 locators, the server MUST return the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option in the Reply message with no SRv6 Locator prefixes in the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR and with a Status Code option containing status code NoSRv6LocatorAvail in the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR. After receiving a DHCP message with multiple IA_SRV6_LOCATOR options at the same time, whether the server can assign multiple SRv6 Locators to the client depends on the server policy, which is out of scope for this document. 5.1.3. DHCP Relay Agent Behavior For the scenario described in Section 2, if an external DHCPv6 server is deployed to allocate SRv6 locators, the DHCPv6 relay agent service needs to be enabled on the layer 3 network nodes close to the CPE. As shown in the figure below, the DHCP relay function is enabled on the router directly connected to the CPE. This deployment assumes that all of the relevant components in Figure 4 are part of a single trusted SR domain. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 DHCP Relay +------+ +------+ +------+ +-----+ | Host +-----+ CPE +-------+Router+------+ BRAS| +------+ +------+ +------+ +--+--+ | | +------+-----+ | Backbone | | Network | +------------+ Figure 4: CPE accessed through DHCP relay When the last DHCPv6 relay agent in the return path to the client receives DHCPv6 Relay-reply messages, it extracts the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option from the Reply message, and obtains the SRv6 locator assigned by the DHCPv6 server according to IA SRv6 Locator option. The first DHCPv6 relay agent needs to record the SRv6 locator assigned by the DHCPv6 server, including SRv6 locator information, lifetime, etc. and generates SRv6 locator route locally. The outgoing interface of the route is the access interface connecting the client. After receiving the DHCPv6 Release and Decline messages from the client, or the valid lifetime of SRv6 Locator prefix expires, the DHCPv6 relay agent MUST delete the SRv6 locator route locally. 6. Implementation Status [Note to the RFC Editor - remove this section before publication, as well as remove the reference to [RFC7942]. This section records the status of known implementations of the protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in [RFC7942]. The description of implementations in this section is intended to assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual implementation here does not imply endorsement by the IETF. Furthermore, no effort has been spent to verify the information presented here that was supplied by IETF contributors. This is not intended as, and must not be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their features. Readers are advised to note that other implementations may exist. According to [RFC7942], "this will allow reviewers and working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 protocols more mature. It is up to the individual working groups to use this information as they see fit". 6.1. New H3C Technologies * Organization: New H3C Technologies. * Implementation: H3C CR16000, CR19000 series routers implementation of implementation of Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP. * Description: All sections including all the "MUST" and "SHOULD" clauses have been implemented in above-mentioned New H3C Products(running Version 7.1.099 and above). * Maturity Level: Product * Coverage: All sections. * Version: Draft-04 * Licensing: N/A * Implementation experience: Nothing specific. * Contact: linchangwang.04414@h3c.com * Last updated: October 22, 2024 6.2. Raisecom Corporation * Organization: Raisecom Corporation. * Implementation: Raisecom's RaizSec-VNF RaizSec-VNF Series SD-WAN Gateway implementation of Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP * Description: All sections including all the "MUST" and "SHOULD" clauses have been implemented in Raisecom RaizSec-VNF series SD- WAN Gateway. * Maturity Level: GA * Coverage: ALL * Version: Draft-04 * Licensing: N/A * Implementation experience: Nothing specific. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 * Contact: jiarongbin@raisecom.com * Last updated: October 10, 2024 7. IANA Considerations IANA has early assigned the following new DHCPv6 Option Codes in the "Option Codes" registry maintained at . +=======+========================+========+===========+===========+ | Value | Description | Client | Singleton | Reference | | | | ORO | Option | | +=======+========================+========+===========+===========+ | 149 | OPTION_IA_SRV6_LOCATOR | NO | No | [ This | | | | | | Document ]| +-------+------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+ | 150 | OPTION_IALOCATOR | NO | No | [ This | | | | | | Document ]| +-------+------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+ Table 1 8. Security Considerations See Section 22 of [RFC8415] and Section 23 of [RFC7227] for the DHCP security considerations. See [RFC8200] for the IPv6 security considerations. As discussed in Section 22 of [RFC8415]: DHCP lacks end-to-end encryption between clients and servers; thus, hijacking, tampering, and eavesdropping attacks are all possible as a result. In some network environments, it is possible to secure them, as discussed later in Section 22 of [RFC8415]. If not all parties use this mechanism to obtain an SRv6 locator from the DHCPv6 server, there is the possibility of the same SRv6 locator being used by more than one device. Note that this issue would exist on these networks even if DHCP were not used to obtain the SRv6 locator. Server implementations SHOULD consider configuration options to limit the maximum number of SRv6 locators to allocate (both in a single request and in total) to a client. However, note that this does not prevent a bad client actor from pretending to be many different clients and consuming all available SRv6 locators. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 9. Privacy Considerations See Section 23 of [RFC8415] for the DHCP privacy considerations. The SR domain is a trusted domain, as defined in [RFC8402], Sections 2 and 8.2. Having such a well-defined trust boundary is necessary in order to operate SRv6-based services for internal traffic while preventing any external traffic from accessing or exploiting the SRv6-based services. Care and rigor in IPv6 address allocation for use for SRv6 SID allocations and network infrastructure addresses, as distinct from IPv6 addresses allocated for end users and systems (as illustrated in Section 5.1 of [RFC8754]), can provide the clear distinction between internal and external address space that is required to maintain the integrity and security of the SRv6 Domain. When using the method defined in this document to assign SRv6 locators to SRv6 Segment Endpoint Nodes through DHCPv6, it is important to ensure that CPEs and BRAS devices operate within a single trusted SR domain. 10. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Chongfeng Xie, Joel Halpern, Robert Raszuk, Aihua Liu, Cheng Li, Xuewei Wang, Hao Li, Junjie Wang, Mengxiao Chen, Fang Gao, Aijun Wang, Xinxin Yi, Shenchao Xu, Yisong Liu, Xueshun Wang and Liyan Gong for their comments to this document. 11. References 11.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC7550] Troan, O., Volz, B., Siodelski, M., "Issues and Recommendations with Multiple Stateful DHCPv6 Options", RFC 7550, DOI 10.17487/RFC7550, May 2015, . [RFC8168] Li, T., Liu, C., Cui, Y., "DHCPv6 Prefix-Length Hint Issues", RFC 8168, DOI 10.17487/RFC8168, May 2017, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, May 2017. Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 [RFC8402] Filsfils, C., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Ginsberg, L., Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "SegmentRouting Architecture", RFC 8402, DOI 10.17487/RFC8402,July 2018, . [RFC8415] Mrugalski, T., Siodelski, M ., Volz, B., Yourtchenko, A., Richardson, M., Jiang, S., Lemon, T., and Winters, T., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 8415, DOI 10.17487/RFC8415, November 2018, . [RFC8986] Filsfils, C., Ed., Camarillo, P., Ed., Leddy, J., Voyer, D., Matsushima, S., and Z. Li, "Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Network Programming", RFC 8986, DOI 10.17487/RFC8986, February 2021, . 11.2. Informative References [RFC8754] Filsfils, C., Ed., Dukes, D., Ed., Previdi, S., Leddy, J., Matsushima, S., and D. Voyer, "IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)", RFC 8754, DOI 10.17487/RFC8754, March 2020, . Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP October 2024 Authors' Addresses Weiqiang Cheng China Mobile Email: chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com Ruibo Han China Mobile Email: hanruibo@chinamobile.com Changwang Lin New H3C Technologies Email: linchangwang.04414@h3c.com Yuanxiang Qiu New H3C Technologies Email: qiuyuanxiang@h3c.com Geng Zhang China Mobile Email: zhanggeng@chinamobile.com Cheng, et al. Expires May, 2025 [Page 18]