Operations and Management Area Working Group M. Boucadair, Ed. Internet-Draft Orange Intended status: Standards Track R. Roberts Expires: 9 March 2025 Juniper O. G. D. Dios Telefonica S. B. Giraldo Nokia B. Wu Huawei Technologies 5 September 2024 A Network YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-13 Abstract This document specifies a network model for attachment circuits. The model can be used for the provisioning of attachment circuits prior or during service provisioning (e.g., VPN, Network Slice Service). A companion service model is specified in the YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS) (I-D.ietf- opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit). The module augments the base network ('ietf-network') and the Service Attachment Point (SAP) models with the detailed information for the provisioning of attachment circuits in Provider Edges (PEs). Discussion Venues This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Discussion of this document takes place on the Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group mailing list (opsawg@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/. Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/boucadair/attachment-circuit-model. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 1] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 9 March 2025. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) . . . . . . 5 2. Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Relationship to Other AC Data Models . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4. Sample Uses of the Attachment Circuit Data Models . . . . . . 8 5. Description of the Attachment Circuit YANG Module . . . . . . 10 5.1. Overall Structure of the Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.2. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.3. Provisioning Profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.4. L2 Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 5.5. IP Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5.6. Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5.6.1. Static Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 5.6.2. BGP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 5.6.3. OSPF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 5.6.4. IS-IS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 5.6.5. RIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 5.6.6. VRRP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 5.7. OAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 5.8. Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 2] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 5.9. Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 6. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Appendix A. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 A.1. VPLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 A.2. Parent AC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 1. Introduction Connectivity services are provided by networks to customers via dedicated terminating points, such as Service Functions [RFC7665], customer edges (CEs), peer Autonomous System Border Routers (ASBRs), data centers gateways, or Internet Exchange Points. The procedure to provision a service in a service provider network may depend on the practices adopted by a service provider, including the flow put in place for the provisioning of advanced network services and how they are bound to an Attachment Circuit (AC). For example, the same attachment circuit may host multiple services (e.g., Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (VPN), or Layer 3 VPN, or Network Slice Service [RFC9543]). In order to avoid service interference and redundant information in various locations, a service provider may expose an interface to manage ACs network-wide. Customers can then request a standalone attachment circuit to be put in place, and then refer to that attachment circuit when requesting services to be bound to that AC. [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit] specifies a data model for managing attachment circuits as a service. Section 6 specifies a network model for attachment circuits ('ietf- ac-ntw'). The model can be used for the provisioning of ACs prior or during service provisioning. For example, [I-D.ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue] specifies augmentations to the L2VPN Network Model (L2NM) [RFC9291] and the L3VPN Network Model (L3NM) [RFC9182] to bind LxVPNs to ACs that are provisioned using the procedure defined in this document. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 3] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 The document leverages [RFC9182] and [RFC9291] by adopting an AC provisioning structure that uses data nodes that are defined in these RFCs. Some refinements were introduced to cover, not only conventional service provider networks, but also specifics of other target deployments (cloud network, for example). The AC network model is designed as augmentations to both the 'ietf- network' model [RFC8345] and the Service Attachment Point (SAP) model [RFC9408]. An attachment circuit can be bound to a single or multiple SAPs. Likewise, the model is designed to accommodate deployments where a SAP can be bound to one or multiple ACs (e.g., a parent AC and its child ACs). .---. |CE6| '-+-' ac | .---. .---. | |CE5+------+------+CE2| .-----+-----. '---' | '---' | | |ac | | | .-+-. .-+-. .-+-. .-+sap+-------+sap+-. .-+sap+-------------. | '---' '---' | | '---' | | PE1 | | PE2 | .---. .-+-. | | | |CE1+--+sap| | | | '---'ac'-+-' | | | '-------------------' '-------------------' .-------------------. .-------------------. | | | .-+-.ac.---. | PE3 | | PE4 |sap+--+CE5| | | | '---' '---' | | | | | .---. | | .---. .---. .---. | '-------------+sap+-' '-+sap+-+sap+-+sap+-' '-+-' '-+-' '-+-' '-+-' |ac | |ac |ac .-+-. | .-+-. | |CE3+-----ac-----' |CE4+---' '---' '---' Figure 1: Attachment Circuits Examples The AC network model uses the AC common model defined in [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac]. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 4] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in [RFC8342]. Sample examples are provided in Appendix A. 1.1. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) Note to the RFC Editor: This section is to be removed prior to publication. This document contains placeholder values that need to be replaced with finalized values at the time of publication. This note summarizes all of the substitutions that are needed. Please apply the following replacements: * CCCC --> the assigned RFC number for [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac] * SSSS --> the assigned RFC number for [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit] * XXXX --> the assigned RFC number for this I-D * 2024-05-15 --> the actual date of the publication of this document 2. Conventions and Definitions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. The reader should be familiar with the terms defined in Section 2 of [RFC9408]. This document uses the term "network model" as defined in Section 2.1 of [RFC8969]. The meanings of the symbols in the YANG tree diagrams are defined in [RFC8340]. LxSM refers to both the Layer 2 Service Model (L2SM) [RFC8466] and the Layer 3 Service Model (L3SM) [RFC8299]. LxNM refers to both the L2VPN Network Model (L2NM) [RFC9291] and the L3VPN Network Model (L3NM) [RFC9182]. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 5] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 The following are used in the module prefixes: ac: Attachment circuit ntw: Network sap: Service Attchment Point svc: Service In addition, this document uses the following terms: Bearer: A physical or logical link that connects a customer node (or site) to a provider network. A bearer can be a wireless or wired link. One or multiple technologies can be used to build a bearer. The bearer type can be specified by a customer. The operator allocates a unique bearer reference to identify a bearer within its network (e.g., customer line identifier). Such a reference can be retrieved by a customer and then used in subsequent service placement requests to unambiguously identify where a service is to be bound. The concept of bearer can be generalized to refer to the required underlying connection for the provisioning of an attachment circuit. One or multiple attachment circuits may be hosted over the same bearer (e.g., multiple Virtual Local Area Networks (VLANs) on the same bearer that is provided by a physical link). Network controller: Denotes a functional entity responsible for the management of the service provider network. One or multiple network controllers can be deployed in a service provider network. Service orchestrator: Refers to a functional entity that interacts with the customer of a network service. A service orchestrator is typically responsible for the attachment circuits, the Provider Edge (PE) selection, and requesting the activation of the requested services to a network controller. A service orchestrator may interact with one or more network controllers. Service provider network: A network that is able to provide network Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 6] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 services (e.g., L2VPN, L3VPN, or Network Slice Services). Service provider: A service provider that offers network services (e.g., L2VPN, L3VPN, or Network Slice Services). The names of data nodes are prefixed using the prefix associated with the corresponding imported YANG module as shown in Table 1: +=============+=====================+=========================+ | Prefix | Module | Reference | +=============+=====================+=========================+ | ac-common | ietf-ac-common | RFC CCCC | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | ac-svc | ietf-ac-svc | Section 5.2 of RFC SSSS | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | dot1q-types | ieee802-dot1q-types | [IEEE802.1Qcp] | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | if | ietf-interfaces | [RFC8343] | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | inet | ietf-inet-types | Section 4 of [RFC6991] | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | key-chain | ietf-key-chain | [RFC8177] | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | nacm | ietf-netconf-acm | [RFC8341] | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | nw | ietf-network | [RFC8345] | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | rt-types | ietf-routing-types | [RFC8294] | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | rt-pol | ietf-routing-policy | [RFC9067] | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | sap | ietf-sap-ntw | [RFC9408] | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ | vpn-common | ietf-vpn-common | [RFC9181] | +-------------+---------------------+-------------------------+ Table 1: Modules and Their Associated Prefixes 3. Relationship to Other AC Data Models Figure 2 depicts the relationship between the various AC data models: * "ietf-ac-common" ([I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac]) * "ietf-bearer-svc" (Section 5.1 of [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit]) Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 7] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 * "ietf-ac-svc" (Section 5.2 of [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit]) * "ietf-ac-ntw" (Section 6) * "ietf-ac-glue" ([I-D.ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue]) ietf-ac-common ^ ^ ^ | | | +----------+ | +----------+ | | | | | | ietf-ac-svc <--> ietf-bearer-svc | ^ ^ | | | | | +------------------------ ietf-ac-ntw | ^ | | | | +----------- ietf-ac-glue -----------+ Figure 2: AC Data Models "ietf-ac-common" is imported by "ietf-bearer-svc", "ietf-ac-svc", and "ietf-ac-ntw". Bearers managed using "ietf-bearer-svc" may be referenced in the service ACs managed using "ietf-ac-svc". Similarly, a bearer managed using "ietf-bearer-svc" may list the set of ACs that use that bearer. In order to ease correlation between an AC service requests and the actual AC provisioned in the network, "ietf-ac-ntw" uses the AC references exposed by "ietf-ac-svc". To bind Layer 2 VPN or Layer 3 VPN services with ACs, "ietf-ac-glue" augments the LxSM and LxNM with AC service references exposed by "ietf-ac-svc" and AC network references exposed by "ietf-ac-ntw". 4. Sample Uses of the Attachment Circuit Data Models Figure 3 shows the positioning of the AC network model in the overall service delivery process. The 'ietf-ac-ntw' module is a network model which augments the SAP with a comprehensive set of parameters to reflect the attachment circuits that are in place in a network. The model also maintains the mapping with the service references that are used to expose these ACs to customers [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit]. Whether the same naming conventions to reference an AC are used in the service and network layers is deployment-specific. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 8] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 .---------------. | Customer | '-------+-------' Customer Service Model | ietf-l2vpn-svc, ietf-l3vpn-svc, | ietf-network-slice-service, ietf-ac-svc, ietf-ac-glue, | and ietf-bearer-svc .-------+-------. | Service | | Orchestration | '-------+-------' Network Model | ietf-l2vpn-ntw, ietf-l3vpn-ntw, | ietf-sap-ntw, ietf-ac-glue, and ietf-ac-ntw | .-------+-------. | Network | | Orchestration | '-------+-------' Network Configuration Model | .-----------+-----------. | | .--------+------. .--------+------. | Domain | | Domain | | Orchestration | | Orchestration | '---+-----------' '--------+------' Device | | | Configuration | | | Model | | | .----+----. | | | Config | | | | Manager | | | '----+----' | | | | | | NETCONF/CLI.................. | | | .--------------------------------. .----. Bearer | | Bearer .----. |CE#1+--------+ Network +--------+CE#2| '----' | | '----' '--------------------------------' Site A Site B Figure 3: An Example of the Network AC Model Usage Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 9] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 Similar to [RFC9408], the 'ietf-ac-ntw' module can be used for both User-to-Network Interface (UNI) and Network-to-Network Interface (NNI). For example, all the ACs shown in Figure 4 have a 'role' set to 'ietf-sap-ntw:nni'. Typically, ASBRs of each network are directly connected to ASBRs of a neighboring network via one or multiple links (bearers). ASBRs of "Network#1" behave as a PE and treat the other adjacent ASBRs as if it were a CE. .--------------------. .-------------. | +---AC----+ | | | | | | +---AC----+ Network#2 | | | | | | Network#1 | '-------------' | | | | .-------------. | | | | | | | | | +---AC----+ Network#3 | | | | | '--------------------' '-------------' Figure 4: An Example of the Network AC Model Usage Between Provider Networks 5. Description of the Attachment Circuit YANG Module The full tree diagram of the 'ietf-ac-ntw' module can be generated using the "pyang" tool [PYANG]. That tree is not included here because it is too long (Section 3.4 of [RFC8340]). Instead, subtrees are provided in the following subsections for the reader's convenience. The full tree of the 'ietf-ac-ntw' is provided in [AC-Ntw-Tree]. 5.1. Overall Structure of the Module The overall tree structure of the 'ietf-ac-ntw' module is shown in Figure 5. augment /nw:networks/nw:network: +--rw specific-provisioning-profiles | ... +--rw ac-profile* [name] ... augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 10] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 +--rw ac-svc-ref? ac-svc:attachment-circuit-reference +--rw ac-profile* [ac-profile-ref] | +--rw ac-profile-ref leafref | +--rw network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id +--rw ac-parent-ref | +--rw ac-ref? leafref | +--rw node-ref? leafref | +--rw network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id +--ro ac-child-ref | +--ro ac-ref* leafref | +--ro node-ref? leafref | +--ro network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id +--rw peer-sap-id* string +--rw group* [group-id] | +--rw group-id string | +--rw precedence? identityref +--rw status | +--rw admin-status | | +--rw status? identityref | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | +--ro oper-status | +--ro status? identityref | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time +--rw description? string +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/sap:service/sap:sap: +--rw ac* [ac-ref] +--rw ac-ref leafref +--rw node-ref? leafref +--rw network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id Figure 5: Overall Tree Structure A node can host one or more SAPs. Per [RFC9408], a SAP is an abstraction of the network reference point (the PE side of an AC, in the context of this document) where network services can be delivered and/or are delivered to customers. Each SAP terminates one or Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 11] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 multiple ACs. Each AC in turn may be terminated by one or more peer SAPs ('peer-sap'). In order to expose such AC/SAP binding information, the SAP model [RFC9408] is augmented with required AC- related information. Unlike the AC service model [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit], an AC is uniquely identified by a name within the scope of a node, not a network. A textual description of the AC may be provided ('description'). Also, in order to ease the correlation between the AC exposed at the service layer and the AC that is actually provisioned in the network operation, a reference to the AC exposed to the customer ('ac-svc- ref') is stored in the 'ietf-ac-ntw' module. ACs that are terminated by a SAP are listed in the 'ac' container under '/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/sap:service/sap:sap'. A controller may indicate a filter based on the service type (e.g., Network Slice or L3VPN) to retrieve the list of available SAPs, and thus ACs, for that service. In order to factorize common data that is provisioned for a group of ACs, a set of profiles (Section 5.3) can be defined at the network level, and then called under the node level. The information contained in a profile is thus inherited, unless the corresponding data node is refined at the AC level. In such a case, the value provided at the AC level takes precedence over the global one. In contexts where the same AC is terminated by multiple peer SAPs (e.g., an AC with multiple CEs) but a subset of them have specific information, the module allows operators to: * Define a parent AC that may list all these CEs as peer SAPs. * Create individual ACs that are bound to the parent AC using 'ac- parent-ref'. * Indicate for each individual AC one or a subset of the CEs as peer SAPs. All these individual ACs will inherit the properties of the parent AC. Whenever a parent AC is deleted, then all child ACs of that AC MUST be deleted. Child ACs are referenced using 'ac-child-ref'. An AC may belong to one or multiple groups [RFC9181]. For example, the 'group-id' is used to associate redundancy or protection constraints with ACs. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 12] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 The status of an AC can be tracked using 'status'. Both operational status and administrative status are maintained. A mismatch between the administrative status vs. the operational status can be used as a trigger to detect anomalies. An AC can be characterized using Layer 2 connectivity (Section 5.4), Layer 3 connectivity (Section 5.5), routing protocols (Section 5.6), Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) (Section 5.7), security (Section 5.8), and service (Section 5.9) considerations. Features are used to tag conditional protions to accomodate various deployments (support of layer 2 ACs, Layer 3 ACs, IPv4, IPv6, routing protocols, BFD, etc.). 5.2. References The AC module defines a set of groupings depicted in Figure 6 for referencing purposes. These references are used within or outside the AC network module. The use of such groupings is consistent with the design in [RFC8345]. grouping attachment-circuit-reference: +-- ac-ref? leafref +-- node-ref? leafref +-- network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id grouping attachment-circuit-references: +-- ac-ref* leafref +-- node-ref? leafref +-- network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id grouping ac-profile-reference: +-- ac-profile-ref? leafref +-- network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id grouping encryption-profile-reference: +-- encryption-profile-ref? leafref +-- network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id grouping qos-profile-reference: +-- qos-profile-ref? leafref +-- network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id grouping failure-detection-profile-reference: +-- failure-detection-profile-ref? leafref +-- network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id grouping forwarding-profile-reference: +-- forwarding-profile-ref? leafref +-- network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id grouping routing-profile-reference: +-- routing-profile-ref? leafref +-- network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id Figure 6: References Groupings Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 13] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 The groupings shown in Figure 6 contain the information necessary to reference: * an attachment circuit that is terminated by a specific node in a given network, * an attachment circuit profile of a specific network (Section 5.3), and * specific provisioning profiles that are bound to a specific network (Section 5.3). 5.3. Provisioning Profiles The AC and specific provisioning profiles tree structure is shown in Figure 7. augment /nw:networks/nw:network: +--rw specific-provisioning-profiles | +--rw valid-provider-identifiers | +--rw encryption-profile-identifier* [id] | | +--rw id string | +--rw qos-profile-identifier* [id] | | +--rw id string | +--rw failure-detection-profile-identifier* [id] | | +--rw id string | +--rw forwarding-profile-identifier* [id] | | +--rw id string | +--rw routing-profile-identifier* [id] | +--rw id string +--rw ac-profile* [name] +--rw name string +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw bgp | | +--rw peer-groups | | +--rw peer-group* [name] | | +--rw name string | | +--rw description? string | | +--rw apply-policy | | | +--rw import-policy* leafref | | | +--rw default-import-policy? | | | | default-policy-type | | | +--rw export-policy* leafref | | | +--rw default-export-policy? | | | default-policy-type Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 14] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | +--rw local-as? inet:as-number | | +--rw peer-as inet:as-number | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw multihop? uint8 | | +--rw as-override? boolean | | +--rw allow-own-as? uint8 | | +--rw prepend-global-as? boolean | | +--rw send-default-route? boolean | | +--rw site-of-origin? | | | rt-types:route-origin | | +--rw ipv6-site-of-origin? | | | rt-types:ipv6-route-origin | | +--rw redistribute-connected* [address-family] | | | +--rw address-family identityref | | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | +--rw bgp-max-prefix | | | +--rw max-prefix? uint32 | | | +--rw warning-threshold? decimal64 | | | +--rw violate-action? enumeration | | | +--rw restart-timer? uint32 | | +--rw bgp-timers | | | +--rw keepalive? uint16 | | | +--rw hold-time? uint16 | | +--rw capability* [address-family] | | +--rw address-family identityref | | +--rw name identityref | +--rw ospf | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw area-id yang:dotted-quad | | +--rw metric? uint16 | | +--rw max-lsa? uint32 | | +--rw passive? boolean | +--rw isis | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw area-address area-address | | +--rw level? identityref | | +--rw metric? uint32 | | +--rw passive? boolean | +--rw rip | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw timers | | | +--rw update-interval? uint16 | | | +--rw invalid-interval? uint16 | | | +--rw holddown-interval? uint16 | | | +--rw flush-interval? uint16 | | +--rw default-metric? uint8 | +--rw vrrp | +--rw address-family? identityref Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 15] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | +--rw ping-reply? boolean +--rw oam +--rw bfd {vpn-common:bfd}? +--rw session-type? identityref +--rw desired-min-tx-interval? uint32 +--rw required-min-rx-interval? uint32 +--rw local-multiplier? uint8 +--rw holdtime? uint32 Figure 7: Profiles Tree Structure Similar to [RFC9182] and [RFC9291], the exact definition of the specific provisioning profiles is local to each service provider. The model only includes an identifier for these profiles in order to ease identifying and binding local policies when building an AC. As shown in Figure 7, the following identifiers can be included: 'encryption-profile-identifier': An encryption profile refers to a set of policies related to the encryption schemes and setup that can be applied on the AC. See also Section 5.8. 'qos-profile-identifier': A Quality of Service (QoS) profile refers to a set of policies such as classification, marking, and actions (e.g., [RFC3644]). See also Section 5.9. 'failure-detection-profile-identifier': A failure detection profile refers to a set of failure detection policies such as Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) policies [RFC5880] that can be invoked when building an AC. Such a profile can be, for example, referenced in static routes (Section 5.6.1) or under the OAM level (Section 5.7). The use of this profile is similar to the detailed examples depicted in Appendices A.11.3 and A.12 of [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit]. 'forwarding-profile-identifier': A forwarding profile refers to the policies that apply to the forwarding of packets conveyed over an AC. Such policies may consist of, for example, applying Access Control Lists (ACLs) as in Section 5.9. 'routing-profile-identifier': A routing profile refers to a set of routing policies that will be invoked (e.g., BGP policies) for an AC. Refer to Section 5.6. 5.4. L2 Connection The 'l2-connection' container is used to manage the Layer 2 properties of an AC. The Layer 2 connection tree structure is shown in Figure 8. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 16] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string + ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | +--rw encapsulation | | +--rw encap-type? identityref | | +--rw dot1q | | | +--rw tag-type? identityref | | | +--rw cvlan-id? uint16 | | | +--rw tag-operations | | | +--rw (op-choice)? | | | | +--:(pop) | | | | | +--rw pop? empty | | | | +--:(push) | | | | | +--rw push? empty | | | | +--:(translate) | | | | +--rw translate? empty | | | +--rw tag-1? dot1q-types:vlanid | | | +--rw tag-1-type? | | | | dot1q-types:dot1q-tag-type | | | +--rw tag-2? dot1q-types:vlanid | | | +--rw tag-2-type? | | | dot1q-types:dot1q-tag-type | | +--rw priority-tagged | | | +--rw tag-type? identityref | | +--rw qinq | | +--rw tag-type? identityref | | +--rw svlan-id? uint16 | | +--rw cvlan-id? uint16 | | +--rw tag-operations | | +--rw (op-choice)? | | | +--:(pop) | | | | +--rw pop? uint8 | | | +--:(push) | | | | +--rw push? empty | | | +--:(translate) | | | +--rw translate? uint8 | | +--rw tag-1? dot1q-types:vlanid | | +--rw tag-1-type? | | | dot1q-types:dot1q-tag-type | | +--rw tag-2? dot1q-types:vlanid | | +--rw tag-2-type? | | dot1q-types:dot1q-tag-type | +--rw (l2-service)? | | +--:(l2-tunnel-service) | | | +--rw l2-tunnel-service | | | +--rw type? identityref Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 17] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | | +--rw pseudowire | | | | +--rw vcid? uint32 | | | | +--rw far-end? union | | | +--rw vpls | | | | +--rw vcid? uint32 | | | | +--rw far-end* union | | | +--rw vxlan | | | +--rw vni-id? uint32 | | | +--rw peer-mode? identityref | | | +--rw peer-ip-address* inet:ip-address | | +--:(l2vpn) | | +--rw l2vpn-id? vpn-common:vpn-id | +--rw l2-termination-point? string | +--rw local-bridge-reference? string | +--rw bearer-reference? string | | {ac-common:server-assigned-reference}? | +--rw lag-interface {vpn-common:lag-interface}? | +--rw lag-interface-id? string | +--rw member-link-list | +--rw member-link* [name] | +--rw name string +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... Figure 8: Layer 2 Connection Tree Structure The 'encapsulation' container specifies the Layer 2 encapsulation to use (if any) and allows the configuration of the relevant tags. Also, the model supports tag manipulation operations (e.g., tag rewrite). The 'l2-tunnel-service' container is used to specify the required parameters to set a Layer 2 tunneling service (e.g., a Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS), a Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN), or a pseudowire (Section 6.1 of [RFC8077])). 'l2vpn-id' is used to identify a L2VPN service that is associated with an Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB) interface. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 18] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 Specific Layer 2 sub-interfaces may be required to be configured in some implementations/deployments. Such a Layer-2-specific interface can be included in 'l2-termination-point'. To accommodate implementations that require internal bridging, a local bridge reference can be specified in 'local-bridge-reference'. Such a reference may be a local bridge domain. A reference to the bearer used by this AC is maintained using 'bearer-reference'. 5.5. IP Connection This 'ip-connection' container is used to group Layer 3 connectivity information, particularly the IP addressing information, of an AC. The Layer 3 connection tree structure is shown in Figure 9. augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string + ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | +--rw l3-termination-point? string | +--rw ipv4 {vpn-common:ipv4}? | | +--rw local-address? | | | inet:ipv4-address | | +--rw prefix-length? uint8 | | +--rw address-allocation-type? | | | identityref | | +--rw (allocation-type)? | | +--:(dynamic) | | | +--rw (address-assign)? | | | | +--:(number) | | | | | +--rw number-of-dynamic-address? uint16 | | | | +--:(explicit) | | | | +--rw customer-addresses | | | | +--rw address-pool* [pool-id] | | | | +--rw pool-id string | | | | +--rw start-address | | | | | inet:ipv4-address | | | | +--rw end-address? | | | | inet:ipv4-address | | | +--rw (provider-dhcp)? | | | | +--:(dhcp-service-type) | | | | | +--rw dhcp-service-type? Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 19] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | | | | enumeration | | | | +--:(service-type) | | | | +--rw (service-type)? | | | | +--:(relay) | | | | +--rw server-ip-address* | | | | inet:ipv4-address | | | +--rw (dhcp-relay)? | | | +--:(customer-dhcp-servers) | | | +--rw customer-dhcp-servers | | | +--rw server-ip-address* | | | inet:ipv4-address | | +--:(static-addresses) | | +--rw address* [address-id] | | +--rw address-id string | | +--rw customer-address? | | | inet:ipv4-address | | +--rw failure-detection-profile-ref? leafref | | +--rw network-ref? | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | +--rw ipv6 {vpn-common:ipv6}? | +--rw local-address? | | inet:ipv6-address | +--rw prefix-length? uint8 | +--rw address-allocation-type? | | identityref | +--rw (allocation-type)? | +--:(dynamic) | | +--rw (address-assign)? | | | +--:(number) | | | | +--rw number-of-dynamic-address? uint16 | | | +--:(explicit) | | | +--rw customer-addresses | | | +--rw address-pool* [pool-id] | | | +--rw pool-id string | | | +--rw start-address | | | | inet:ipv6-address | | | +--rw end-address? | | | inet:ipv6-address | | +--rw (provider-dhcp)? | | | +--:(dhcp-service-type) | | | | +--rw dhcp-service-type? | | | | enumeration | | | +--:(service-type) | | | +--rw (service-type)? | | | +--:(relay) | | | +--rw server-ip-address* | | | inet:ipv6-address | | +--rw (dhcp-relay)? Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 20] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | +--:(customer-dhcp-servers) | | +--rw customer-dhcp-servers | | +--rw server-ip-address* | | inet:ipv6-address | +--:(static-addresses) | +--rw address* [address-id] | +--rw address-id string | +--rw customer-address? | | inet:ipv6-address | +--rw failure-detection-profile-ref? leafref | +--rw network-ref? | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id +--rw routing-protocols | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... Figure 9: IP Connection Tree Structure A distinct Layer 3 interface other than the interface indicated under the 'l2-connection' container may be needed to terminate the Layer 3 connectivity. The identifier of such an interface is included in 'l3-termination-point'. For example, this data node can be used to carry the identifier of a bridge domain interface. This container can include IPv4, IPv6, or both if dual-stack is enabled. For both IPv4 and IPv6, the IP connection supports three IP address assignment modes for customer addresses: provider DHCP, DHCP relay, and static addressing. Note that for the IPv6 case, Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) [RFC4862] can be used. For both IPv4 and IPv6, 'address-allocation-type' is used to indicate the IP address allocation mode to activate for an AC. The allocated address represents the PE interface address configuration. When 'address-allocation-type' is set to 'provider-dhcp', DHCP assignments can be made locally or by an external DHCP server. Such behavior is controlled by setting 'dhcp-service-type'. For IPv6, if 'address-allocation-type' is set to 'slaac', the Prefix Information option of Router Advertisements that will be issued for SLAAC purposes will carry the IPv6 prefix that is determined by 'local-address' and 'prefix-length'. For example, if 'local-address' is set to '2001:db8:0:1::1' and 'prefix-length' is set to '64', the IPv6 prefix that will be used is '2001:db8:0:1::/64'. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 21] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 In some deployment contexts (e.g., network merging), multiple IP subnets may be used in a transition period. For such deployments, multiple ACs (typically, two) with overlapping information may be maintained during a transition period. The correlation between these ACs may rely upon the same 'ac-svc-ref'. 5.6. Routing The overall routing subtree structure is shown in Figure 10. module: ietf-ac-ntw augment /nw:networks/nw:network: +--rw ac-profile* [name] +--rw name string +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | ... | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | ... +--rw oam ... augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw routing-profile* [routing-profile-ref] | | +--rw routing-profile-ref leafref | | +--rw network-ref? | | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw static Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 22] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | ... | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | ... | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... Figure 10: Routing Tree Structure Multiple routing instances ('routing-protocol') can be defined, each uniquely identified by an 'id'. Specifically, each instance is uniquely identified to accommodate scenarios where multiple instances of the same routing protocol have to be configured on the same AC. The type of a routing instance is indicated in 'type'. The values of this attribute are those defined in [RFC9181] (the 'routing-protocol- type' identity). Specific data nodes are then provided as a function of the 'type'. See more details in the following subsections. One or multiple routing profiles ('routing-profile') can be provided for a given routing instance. 5.6.1. Static Routing The static routing subtree structure is shown in Figure 11. module: ietf-ac-ntw ... augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 23] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw routing-profile* [routing-profile-ref] | | +--rw routing-profile-ref leafref | | +--rw network-ref? | | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw static | | +--rw cascaded-lan-prefixes | | +--rw ipv4-lan-prefix* [lan next-hop] | | | {vpn-common:ipv4}? | | | +--rw lan inet:ipv4-prefix | | | +--rw lan-tag? string | | | +--rw next-hop union | | | +--rw metric? uint32 | | | +--rw bfd {vpn-common:bfd}? | | | | +--rw enabled? | | | | | boolean | | | | +--rw failure-detection-profile-ref? | | | | | leafref | | | | +--rw network-ref? | | | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | | | +--rw preference? uint32 | | | +--rw status | | | +--rw admin-status | | | | +--rw status? identityref | | | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | | | +--ro oper-status | | | +--ro status? identityref | | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | | +--rw ipv6-lan-prefix* [lan next-hop] | | {vpn-common:ipv6}? | | +--rw lan inet:ipv6-prefix | | +--rw lan-tag? string | | +--rw next-hop union | | +--rw metric? uint32 | | +--rw bfd {vpn-common:bfd}? | | | +--rw enabled? | | | | boolean | | | +--rw failure-detection-profile-ref? | | | | leafref | | | +--rw network-ref? | | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | | +--rw preference? uint32 | | +--rw status | | +--rw admin-status | | | +--rw status? identityref Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 24] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | | +--ro oper-status | | +--ro status? identityref | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | ... | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... Figure 11: Static Routing Tree Structure The following data nodes can be defined for a given IP prefix: 'lan-tag': Indicates a local tag (e.g., "myfavorite-lan") that is used to enforce local policies. 'next-hop': Indicates the next hop to be used for the static route. It can be identified by an IP address, a predefined next-hop type (e.g., 'discard' or 'local-link'), etc. 'bfd': Indicates whether BFD is enabled or disabled for this static route entry. A BFD profile may also be provided. 'metric': Indicates the metric associated with the static route entry. This metric is used when the route is exported into an IGP. 'preference': Indicates the preference associated with the static route entry. This preference is used to select a preferred route among routes to the same destination prefix. 'status': Used to convey the status of a static route entry. This Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 25] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 data node can also be used to control the (de)activation of individual static route entries. 5.6.2. BGP The BGP routing subtree structure is shown in Figure 12. module: ietf-ac-ntw augment /nw:networks/nw:network: +--rw ac-profile* [name] +--rw name string +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | +--rw peer-groups | | +--rw peer-group* [name] | | +--rw name string | | +--rw description? string | | +--rw apply-policy | | | +--rw import-policy* leafref | | | +--rw default-import-policy? | | | | default-policy-type | | | +--rw export-policy* leafref | | | +--rw default-export-policy? | | | default-policy-type | | +--rw local-as? inet:as-number | | +--rw peer-as inet:as-number | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw role? identityref | | +--rw multihop? uint8 | | +--rw as-override? boolean | | +--rw allow-own-as? uint8 | | +--rw prepend-global-as? boolean | | +--rw send-default-route? boolean | | +--rw site-of-origin? | | | rt-types:route-origin | | +--rw ipv6-site-of-origin? | | | rt-types:ipv6-route-origin | | +--rw redistribute-connected* [address-family] | | | +--rw address-family identityref | | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | +--rw bgp-max-prefix | | | +--rw max-prefix? uint32 | | | +--rw warning-threshold? decimal64 | | | +--rw violate-action? enumeration | | | +--rw restart-timer? uint32 Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 26] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | +--rw bgp-timers | | | +--rw keepalive? uint16 | | | +--rw hold-time? uint16 | | +--rw capability* [address-family] | | +--rw address-family identityref | | +--rw name identityref | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | ... | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | ... +--rw oam ... augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw routing-profile* [routing-profile-ref] | | +--rw routing-profile-ref leafref | | +--rw network-ref? | | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw static | | ... | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | +--rw peer-groups | | | +--rw peer-group* [name] | | | +--rw name string | | | +--rw local-address? union | | | +--rw description? string | | | +--rw apply-policy | | | | +--rw import-policy* leafref | | | | +--rw default-import-policy? | | | | | default-policy-type | | | | +--rw export-policy* leafref | | | | +--rw default-export-policy? | | | | default-policy-type Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 27] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | | +--rw local-as? inet:as-number | | | +--rw peer-as inet:as-number | | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | | +--rw role? identityref | | | +--rw multihop? uint8 | | | +--rw as-override? boolean | | | +--rw allow-own-as? uint8 | | | +--rw prepend-global-as? boolean | | | +--rw send-default-route? boolean | | | +--rw site-of-origin? | | | | rt-types:route-origin | | | +--rw ipv6-site-of-origin? | | | | rt-types:ipv6-route-origin | | | +--rw redistribute-connected* [address-family] | | | | +--rw address-family identityref | | | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | | +--rw bgp-max-prefix | | | | +--rw max-prefix? uint32 | | | | +--rw warning-threshold? decimal64 | | | | +--rw violate-action? enumeration | | | | +--rw restart-timer? uint32 | | | +--rw bgp-timers | | | | +--rw keepalive? uint16 | | | | +--rw hold-time? uint16 | | | +--rw capability* [address-family] | | | | +--rw address-family identityref | | | | +--rw name identityref | | | +--rw authentication | | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | | +--rw keying-material | | | +--rw (option)? | | | +--:(ao) | | | | +--rw enable-ao? boolean | | | | +--rw ao-keychain? | | | | key-chain:key-chain-ref | | | +--:(md5) | | | | +--rw md5-keychain? | | | | key-chain:key-chain-ref | | | +--:(explicit) | | | +--rw key-id? uint32 | | | +--rw key? string | | | +--rw crypto-algorithm? | | | identityref | | +--rw neighbor* [remote-address] | | +--rw remote-address inet:ip-address | | +--rw local-address? union | | +--rw peer-group? | | | -> ../../peer-groups/peer-group/name Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 28] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | +--rw description? string | | +--rw apply-policy | | | +--rw import-policy* leafref | | | +--rw default-import-policy? | | | | default-policy-type | | | +--rw export-policy* leafref | | | +--rw default-export-policy? | | | default-policy-type | | +--rw local-as? inet:as-number | | +--rw peer-as inet:as-number | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw role? identityref | | +--rw multihop? uint8 | | +--rw as-override? boolean | | +--rw allow-own-as? uint8 | | +--rw prepend-global-as? boolean | | +--rw send-default-route? boolean | | +--rw site-of-origin? | | | rt-types:route-origin | | +--rw ipv6-site-of-origin? | | | rt-types:ipv6-route-origin | | +--rw redistribute-connected* [address-family] | | | +--rw address-family identityref | | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | +--rw bgp-max-prefix | | | +--rw max-prefix? uint32 | | | +--rw warning-threshold? decimal64 | | | +--rw violate-action? enumeration | | | +--rw restart-timer? uint32 | | +--rw bgp-timers | | | +--rw keepalive? uint16 | | | +--rw hold-time? uint16 | | +--rw capability* [address-family] | | | +--rw address-family identityref | | | +--rw name identityref | | +--rw bfd {vpn-common:bfd}? | | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | | +--rw failure-detection-profile-ref? leafref | | | +--rw network-ref? | | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | | +--rw authentication | | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | | +--rw keying-material | | | +--rw (option)? | | | +--:(ao) | | | | +--rw enable-ao? boolean | | | | +--rw ao-keychain? | | | | key-chain:key-chain-ref Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 29] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | | +--:(md5) | | | | +--rw md5-keychain? | | | | key-chain:key-chain-ref | | | +--:(explicit) | | | +--rw key-id? uint32 | | | +--rw key? string | | | +--rw crypto-algorithm? identityref | | +--rw status | | +--rw admin-status | | | +--rw status? identityref | | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | | +--ro oper-status | | +--ro status? identityref | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | ... | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... Figure 12: BGP Routing Tree Structure The following data nodes are supported for each 'peer-group': 'name': Defines a name for the peer group. 'local-address': Specifies an address or a reference to an interface to use when establishing the BGP transport session. 'description': Includes a description of the peer group. 'apply-policy': Lists a set of import/export policies [RFC9067] to apply for this group. 'local-as': Indicates a local AS Number (ASN). 'peer-as': Indicates the peer's ASN. 'address-family': Indicates the address family of the peer. It can Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 30] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 be set to 'ipv4', 'ipv6', or 'dual-stack'. This address family might be used together with the service type that uses an AC (e.g., 'vpn-type' [RFC9182]) to derive the appropriate Address Family Identifiers (AFIs) / Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (SAFIs) that will be part of the derived device configurations (e.g., unicast IPv4 MPLS L3VPN (AFI,SAFI = 1,128) as defined in Section 4.3.4 of [RFC4364]). 'role': Specifies the BGP role in a session. Role values are taken from the list defined in Section 4 of [RFC9234]. 'multihop': Indicates the number of allowed IP hops to reach a BGP peer. 'as-override': If set, this parameter indicates whether ASN override is enabled, i.e., replacing the ASN of the customer specified in the AS_PATH BGP attribute with the ASN identified in the 'local- as' attribute. 'allow-own-as': Used in some topologies (e.g., hub-and-spoke) to allow the provider's ASN to be included in the AS_PATH BGP attribute received from a peer. Loops are prevented by setting 'allow-own-as' to a maximum number of the provider's ASN occurrences. By default, this parameter is set to '0' (that is, reject any AS_PATH attribute that includes the provider's ASN). 'prepend-global-as': When distinct ASNs are configured at the node and AC levels, this parameter controls whether the ASN provided at the node level is prepended to the AS_PATH attribute. 'send-default-route': Controls whether default routes can be advertised to the peer. 'site-of-origin': Meant to uniquely identify the set of routes learned from a site via a particular AC. It is used to prevent routing loops (Section 7 of [RFC4364]). The Site of Origin attribute is encoded as a Route Origin Extended Community. 'ipv6-site-of-origin': Carries an IPv6 Address Specific BGP Extended Community that is used to indicate the Site of Origin [RFC5701]. It is used to prevent routing loops. 'redistribute-connected': Controls whether the AC is advertised to other PEs. 'bgp-max-prefix': Controls the behavior when a prefix maximum is reached. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 31] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 'max-prefix': Indicates the maximum number of BGP prefixes allowed in a session for this group. If the limit is reached, the action indicated in 'violate-action' will be followed. 'warning-threshold': A warning notification is triggered when this limit is reached. 'violate-action': Indicates which action to execute when the maximum number of BGP prefixes is reached. Examples of such actions include sending a warning message, discarding extra paths from the peer, or restarting the session. 'restart-timer': Indicates, in seconds, the time interval after which the BGP session will be reestablished. 'bgp-timers': Two timers can be captured in this container: (1) 'hold-time', which is the time interval that will be used for the Hold Timer (Section 4.2 of [RFC4271]) when establishing a BGP session and (2) 'keepalive', which is the time interval for the KeepaliveTimer between a PE and a BGP peer (Section 4.4 of [RFC4271]). Both timers are expressed in seconds. 'capability': Specifies a set of BGP capabilities (e.g., route refresh capability [RFC2918]) to be enabled per address family. 'bfd': Indicates whether BFD is enabled or disabled for this nighbor. A BFD profile to apply may also be provided. 'authentication': The module adheres to the recommendations in Section 13.2 of [RFC4364], as it allows enabling the TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) [RFC5925] and accommodates the installed base that makes use of MD5. In addition, the module includes a provision for using IPsec. This version of the model assumes that parameters specific to the TCP-AO are preconfigured as part of the key chain that is referenced in the model. No assumption is made about how such a key chain is preconfigured. However, the structure of the key chain should cover data nodes beyond those in [RFC8177], mainly SendID and RecvID (Section 3.1 of [RFC5925]). For each neighbor, the following data nodes are supported in addition to similar parameters that are provided for a peer group: 'remote-address': Specifies the remote IP address of a BGP neighbor. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 32] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 'peer-group': A name of a peer group. Parameters that are provided at the 'neighbor' level takes precedence over the ones provided in the peer group. 'status': Indicates the status of the BGP session. 5.6.3. OSPF The OSPF routing subtree structure is shown in Figure 13. module: ietf-ac-ntw augment /nw:networks/nw:network: +--rw ac-profile* [name] +--rw name string +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw area-id yang:dotted-quad | | +--rw metric? uint16 | | +--rw max-lsa? uint32 | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | ... +--rw oam ... augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw routing-profile* [routing-profile-ref] | | +--rw routing-profile-ref leafref Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 33] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | +--rw network-ref? | | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw static | | ... | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw area-id yang:dotted-quad | | +--rw metric? uint16 | | +--rw sham-links {vpn-common:rtg-ospf-sham-link}? | | | +--rw sham-link* [target-site] | | | +--rw target-site string | | | +--rw metric? uint16 | | +--rw max-lsa? uint32 | | +--rw passive? boolean | | +--rw authentication | | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | | +--rw keying-material | | | +--rw (option)? | | | +--:(auth-key-chain) | | | | +--rw key-chain? | | | | key-chain:key-chain-ref | | | +--:(auth-key-explicit) | | | +--rw key-id? uint32 | | | +--rw key? string | | | +--rw crypto-algorithm? identityref | | +--rw status | | +--rw admin-status | | | +--rw status? identityref | | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | | +--ro oper-status | | +--ro status? identityref | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 34] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 Figure 13: OSPF Routing Tree Structure The following OSPF data nodes are supported: 'address-family': Indicates whether IPv4, IPv6, or both address families are to be activated. When the IPv4 or dual-stack address family is requested, it is up to the implementation (e.g., network orchestrator) to decide whether OSPFv2 [RFC4577] or OSPFv3 [RFC6565] is used to announce IPv4 routes. 'area-id': Indicates the OSPF Area ID. 'metric': Associates a metric with OSPF routes. 'sham-links': Used to create OSPF sham links between two ACs sharing the same area and having a backdoor link (Section 4.2.7 of [RFC4577] and Section 5 of [RFC6565]). 'max-lsa': Sets the maximum number of Link State Advertisements (LSAs) that the OSPF instance will accept. 'passive': Controls whether an OSPF interface is passive or active. 'authentication': Controls the authentication schemes to be enabled for the OSPF instance. The following options are supported: IPsec for OSPFv3 authentication [RFC4552], and the Authentication Trailer for OSPFv2 [RFC5709] [RFC7474] and OSPFv3 [RFC7166]. 'status': Indicates the status of the OSPF routing instance. 5.6.4. IS-IS The IS-IS routing subtree structure is shown in Figure 14. module: ietf-ac-ntw augment /nw:networks/nw:network: +--rw ac-profile* [name] +--rw name string +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | ... Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 35] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw area-address area-address | | +--rw level? identityref | | +--rw metric? uint32 | | +--rw passive? boolean | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | ... +--rw oam ... augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string ... +--rw l2-connection | ... +--rw ip-connection | ... +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw routing-profile* [routing-profile-ref] | | +--rw routing-profile-ref leafref | | +--rw network-ref? | | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw static | | ... | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | ... | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw area-address area-address | | +--rw level? identityref | | +--rw metric? uint32 | | +--rw passive? boolean | | +--rw authentication | | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | | +--rw keying-material | | | +--rw (option)? | | | +--:(auth-key-chain) | | | | +--rw key-chain? | | | | key-chain:key-chain-ref Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 36] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | | +--:(auth-key-explicit) | | | +--rw key-id? uint32 | | | +--rw key? string | | | +--rw crypto-algorithm? identityref | | +--rw status | | +--rw admin-status | | | +--rw status? identityref | | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | | +--ro oper-status | | +--ro status? identityref | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... Figure 14: IS-IS Routing Tree Structure The following IS-IS data nodes are supported: 'address-family': Indicates whether IPv4, IPv6, or both address families are to be activated. 'area-address': Indicates the IS-IS area address. 'level': Indicates the IS-IS level: Level 1, Level 2, or both. 'metric': Associates a metric with IS-IS routes. 'passive': Controls whether an IS-IS interface is passive or active. 'authentication': Controls the authentication schemes to be enabled for the IS-IS instance. Both the specification of a key chain [RFC8177] and the direct specification of key and authentication algorithms are supported. 'status': Indicates the status of the IS-IS routing instance. 5.6.5. RIP The RIP routing subtree structure is shown in Figure 15. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 37] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 module: ietf-ac-ntw augment /nw:networks/nw:network: +--rw ac-profile* [name] +--rw name string +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | ... | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw timers | | | +--rw update-interval? uint16 | | | +--rw invalid-interval? uint16 | | | +--rw holddown-interval? uint16 | | | +--rw flush-interval? uint16 | | +--rw default-metric? uint8 | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | ... +--rw oam ... augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw routing-profile* [routing-profile-ref] | | +--rw routing-profile-ref leafref | | +--rw network-ref? | | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw static | | ... | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 38] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | | ... | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | +--rw address-family? identityref | | +--rw timers | | | +--rw update-interval? uint16 | | | +--rw invalid-interval? uint16 | | | +--rw holddown-interval? uint16 | | | +--rw flush-interval? uint16 | | +--rw default-metric? uint8 | | +--rw authentication | | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | | +--rw keying-material | | | +--rw (option)? | | | +--:(auth-key-chain) | | | | +--rw key-chain? | | | | key-chain:key-chain-ref | | | +--:(auth-key-explicit) | | | +--rw key? string | | | +--rw crypto-algorithm? identityref | | +--rw status | | +--rw admin-status | | | +--rw status? identityref | | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | | +--ro oper-status | | +--ro status? identityref | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | +--rw vrrp | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... Figure 15: RIP Routing Tree Structure The following RIP data nodes are supported: 'address-family': Indicates whether IPv4, IPv6, or both address families are to be activated. This parameter is used to determine whether RIPv2 [RFC2453], RIP Next Generation (RIPng) [RFC2080], or both are to be enabled. 'timers': Indicates the following timers (expressed in seconds): Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 39] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 * 'update-interval': The interval at which RIP updates are sent. * 'invalid-interval': The interval before a RIP route is declared invalid. * 'holddown-interval': The interval before better RIP routes are released. * 'flush-interval': The interval before a route is removed from the routing table. 'default-metric': Sets the default RIP metric. 'authentication': Controls the authentication schemes to be enabled for the RIP instance. 'status': Indicates the status of the RIP routing instance. 5.6.6. VRRP The VRRP subtree structure is shown in Figure 16. module: ietf-ac-ntw augment /nw:networks/nw:network: +--rw ac-profile* [name] +--rw name string +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | ... | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | +--rw address-family? identityref | +--rw ping-reply? boolean +--rw oam ... augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 40] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols | +--rw routing-protocol* [id] | +--rw id string | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw routing-profile* [routing-profile-ref] | | +--rw routing-profile-ref leafref | | +--rw network-ref? | | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | | +--rw type? identityref | +--rw static | | ... | +--rw bgp {vpn-common:rtg-bgp}? | | ... | +--rw ospf {vpn-common:rtg-ospf}? | | ... | +--rw isis {vpn-common:rtg-isis}? | | ... | +--rw rip {vpn-common:rtg-rip}? | | ... | +--rw vrrp {vpn-common:rtg-vrrp}? | +--rw address-family? identityref | +--rw vrrp-group? uint8 | +--rw backup-peer? inet:ip-address | +--rw virtual-ip-address* inet:ip-address | +--rw priority? uint8 | +--rw ping-reply? boolean | +--rw status | +--rw admin-status | | +--rw status? identityref | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | +--ro oper-status | +--ro status? identityref | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... Figure 16: VRRP Tree Structure The following VRRP data nodes are supported: 'address-family': Indicates whether IPv4, IPv6, or both address Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 41] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 families are to be activated. Note that VRRP version 3 [RFC9568] supports both IPv4 and IPv6. 'vrrp-group': Used to identify the VRRP group. 'backup-peer': Carries the IP address of the peer. 'virtual-ip-address': Includes virtual IP addresses for a single VRRP group. 'priority': Assigns the VRRP election priority for the backup virtual router. 'ping-reply': Controls whether the VRRP speaker should reply to ping requests. 'status': Indicates the status of the VRRP instance. Note that no authentication data node is included for VRRP, as there isn't any type of VRRP authentication at this time (see Section 9 of [RFC9568]). 5.7. OAM The OAM subtree structure is shown in Figure 17. augment /nw:networks/nw:network: +--rw ac-profile* [name] +--rw name string +--rw routing-protocols | ... +--rw oam +--rw bfd {vpn-common:bfd}? +--rw session-type? identityref +--rw desired-min-tx-interval? uint32 +--rw required-min-rx-interval? uint32 +--rw local-multiplier? uint8 +--rw holdtime? uint32 augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string + ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols | ... Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 42] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 +--rw oam | +--rw bfd {vpn-common:bfd}? | +--rw session* [dest-addr] | +--rw dest-addr inet:ip-address | +--rw source-address? union | +--rw failure-detection-profile-ref? leafref | +--rw network-ref? | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | +--rw session-type? identityref | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval? uint32 | +--rw required-min-rx-interval? uint32 | +--rw local-multiplier? uint8 | +--rw holdtime? uint32 | +--rw authentication! | | +--rw key-chain? key-chain:key-chain-ref | | +--rw meticulous? boolean | +--rw status | +--rw admin-status | | +--rw status? identityref | | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | +--ro oper-status | +--ro status? identityref | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time +--rw security | ... +--rw service ... Figure 17: OAM Tree Structure The following OAM data nodes can be specified for each BFD session: 'dest-addr': Specifies the BFD peer address. This data node is mapped to 'remote-address' of BFD container in [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit]. 'dest-address' is used here to ease the mapping with the underlying device model defind in [RFC9127]. 'source-address': Specifies the local IP address or interface to use for the session. This data node is mapped to 'local-address' of BFD container in [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit]. 'source-address' is used here to ease the mapping with the underlying device model defind in [RFC9127]. 'failure-detection-profile-ref': Refers to BFD profiles in Section 5.3. 'network-ref': Includes a network reference to uniquely identify a Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 43] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 BFD profile. 'session-type': Indicates which BFD flavor is used to set up the session (e.g., classic BFD [RFC5880], Seamless BFD [RFC7880]). By default, it is assumed that the BFD session will follow the behavior specified in [RFC5880]. 'desired-min-tx-interval': The minimum interval, in microseconds, to use when transmitting BFD Control packets, less any jitter applied. 'required-min-rx-interval': The minimum interval, in microseconds, between received BFD Control packets less any jitter applied by the sender. 'local-multiplier': The negotiated transmit interval, multiplied by this value, provides the detection time for the peer. 'holdtime': Used to indicate the expected BFD holddown time, in milliseconds. 'authentication': Includes the required information to enable the BFD authentication modes discussed in Section 6.7 of [RFC5880]. In particular, 'meticulous' controls the activation of meticulous mode as discussed in Sections 6.7.3 and 6.7.4 of [RFC5880]. 'status': Indicates the status of BFD. 5.8. Security The security subtree structure is shown in Figure 18. The 'security' container specifies the the encryption to be applied to traffic for a given AC. The model can be used to directly control the encryption to be applied (e.g., Layer 2 or Layer 3 encryption) or invoke a local encryption profile. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 44] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string + ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | +--rw encryption {vpn-common:encryption}? | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | +--rw layer? enumeration | +--rw encryption-profile | +--rw (profile)? | +--:(provider-profile) | | +--rw encryption-profile-ref? leafref | | +--rw network-ref? | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | +--:(customer-profile) | +--rw customer-key-chain? key-chain:key-chain-ref +--rw service ... Figure 18: Security Tree Structure 5.9. Service The service subtree structure is shown in Figure 19. augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw ac* [name] +--rw name string + ... +--rw l2-connection {ac-common:layer2-ac}? | ... +--rw ip-connection {ac-common:layer3-ac}? | ... +--rw routing-protocols | ... +--rw oam | ... +--rw security | ... +--rw service Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 45] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 +--rw mtu? uint32 +--rw svc-pe-to-ce-bandwidth {vpn-common:inbound-bw}? | +--rw bandwidth* [bw-type] | +--rw bw-type identityref | +--rw (type)? | +--:(per-cos) | | +--rw cos* [cos-id] | | +--rw cos-id uint8 | | +--rw cir? uint64 | | +--rw cbs? uint64 | | +--rw eir? uint64 | | +--rw ebs? uint64 | | +--rw pir? uint64 | | +--rw pbs? uint64 | +--:(other) | +--rw cir? uint64 | +--rw cbs? uint64 | +--rw eir? uint64 | +--rw ebs? uint64 | +--rw pir? uint64 | +--rw pbs? uint64 +--rw svc-ce-to-pe-bandwidth {vpn-common:outbound-bw}? | +--rw bandwidth* [bw-type] | +--rw bw-type identityref | +--rw (type)? | +--:(per-cos) | | +--rw cos* [cos-id] | | +--rw cos-id uint8 | | +--rw cir? uint64 | | +--rw cbs? uint64 | | +--rw eir? uint64 | | +--rw ebs? uint64 | | +--rw pir? uint64 | | +--rw pbs? uint64 | +--:(other) | +--rw cir? uint64 | +--rw cbs? uint64 | +--rw eir? uint64 | +--rw ebs? uint64 | +--rw pir? uint64 | +--rw pbs? uint64 +--rw qos {vpn-common:qos}? | +--rw qos-profiles | +--rw qos-profile* [qos-profile-ref] | +--rw qos-profile-ref leafref | +--rw network-ref? | | -> /nw:networks/network/network-id | +--rw direction? identityref Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 46] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 +--rw access-control-list +--rw acl-profiles +--rw acl-profile* [forwarding-profile-ref] +--rw forwarding-profile-ref leafref +--rw network-ref? -> /nw:networks/network/network-id Figure 19: Service Tree Structure The description of the service data nodes is as follows: 'mtu': Specifies the Layer 2 MTU, in bytes, for the AC. 'svc-pe-to-ce-bandwidth' and 'svc-ce-to-pe-bandwidth': Specify the service bandwidth for the AC. 'svc-pe-to-ce-bandwidth' indicates the inbound bandwidth of the connection (i.e., download bandwidth from the service provider to the site). 'svc-ce-to-pe-bandwidth' indicates the outbound bandwidth of the connection (i.e., upload bandwidth from the site to the service provider). 'svc-pe-to-ce-bandwidth' and 'svc-ce-to-pe-bandwidth' can be represented using the Committed Information Rate (CIR), the Committed Burst Size (CBS), the Excess Information Rate (EIR), the Excess Burst Size (EBS), the Peak Information Rate (PIR), and the Peak Burst Size (PBS). CIR, EIR, and PIR are expressed in bps, while CBS, EBS, and PBS are expressed in bytes. The following types, defined in [RFC9181], can be used to indicate the bandwidth type: 'bw-per-cos': The bandwidth is per CoS. 'bw-per-port': The bandwidth is per port. 'bw-per-site': The bandwidth is to all peer SAPs that belong to the same site. 'bw-per-service': The bandwidth is per service instance that is bound to an AC. 'qos': Specifies a list of QoS profiles to apply for this AC. 'access-control-list': Specifies a list of ACL profiles to apply for this AC. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 47] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 6. YANG Module This module uses types defined in [RFC6991], [RFC8177], [RFC8294], [RFC8343], [RFC9067], [RFC9181], [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac], and [IEEE802.1Qcp]. file "ietf-ac-ntw@2024-05-15.yang" module ietf-ac-ntw { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ac-ntw"; prefix ac-ntw; import ietf-vpn-common { prefix vpn-common; reference "RFC 9181: A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPNs"; } import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types, Section 4"; } import ietf-key-chain { prefix key-chain; reference "RFC 8177: YANG Data Model for Key Chains"; } import ietf-routing-types { prefix rt-types; reference "RFC 8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area"; } import ietf-routing-policy { prefix rt-pol; reference "RFC 9067: A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy"; } import ietf-interfaces { prefix if; reference "RFC 8343: A YANG Data Model for Interface Management"; } import ieee802-dot1q-types { prefix dot1q-types; reference "IEEE Std 802.1Qcp: Bridges and Bridged Networks-- Amendment 30: YANG Data Model"; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 48] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 } import ietf-network { prefix nw; reference "RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies, Section 6.1"; } import ietf-sap-ntw { prefix sap; reference "RFC 9408: A YANG Network Model for Service Attachment Points (SAPs)"; } import ietf-ac-common { prefix ac-common; reference "RFC CCCC: A Common YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits"; } import ietf-ac-svc { prefix ac-svc; reference "RFC SSSS: YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS)"; } organization "IETF OPSAWG (Operations and Management Area Working Group)"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editor: Mohamed Boucadair Author: Richard Roberts Author: Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Author: Samier Barguil Author: Bo Wu "; description "This YANG module defines a YANG network model for the management of attachment circuits. Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 49] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2024-05-15 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG Network Data Model for Attachment Circuits"; } // References /* A set of groupings to ease referencing cross-modules */ grouping attachment-circuit-reference { description "This grouping can be used to reference an attachment circuit in a specific node."; leaf ac-ref { type leafref { path "/nw:networks/nw:network[nw:network-id=current()/../" + "network-ref]/nw:node[nw:node-id=current()/../" + "node-ref]/ac-ntw:ac/ac-ntw:name"; require-instance false; } description "A type for an absolute reference to an attachment circuit."; } uses nw:node-ref; } grouping attachment-circuit-references { description "This grouping can be used to reference a list of attachment circuits in a specific node."; leaf-list ac-ref { type leafref { path "/nw:networks/nw:network[nw:network-id=current()/../" + "network-ref]/nw:node[nw:node-id=current()/../" + "node-ref]/ac-ntw:ac/ac-ntw:name"; require-instance false; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 50] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 } description "A type for an absolute reference to an attachment circuit."; } uses nw:node-ref; } grouping ac-profile-reference { description "This grouping can be used to reference an attachment circuit profile."; leaf ac-profile-ref { type leafref { path "/nw:networks/nw:network[nw:network-id=current()/../" + "network-ref]/ac-ntw:ac-profile/ac-ntw:name"; require-instance false; } description "A type for an absolute reference to an attachment circuit."; } uses nw:network-ref; } grouping encryption-profile-reference { description "This grouping can be used to reference encryption profile."; leaf encryption-profile-ref { type leafref { path "/nw:networks/nw:network[nw:network-id=current()/../" + "network-ref]" + "/ac-ntw:specific-provisioning-profiles" + "/ac-ntw:valid-provider-identifiers" + "/ac-ntw:encryption-profile-identifier/ac-ntw:id"; require-instance false; } description "A type for an absolute reference to an encryption profile."; } uses nw:network-ref; } grouping qos-profile-reference { description "This grouping can be used to reference a QoS profile."; leaf qos-profile-ref { type leafref { path "/nw:networks/nw:network[nw:network-id=current()/../" Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 51] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 + "network-ref]" + "/ac-ntw:specific-provisioning-profiles" + "/ac-ntw:valid-provider-identifiers" + "/ac-ntw:qos-profile-identifier/ac-ntw:id"; require-instance false; } description "Type for an absolute reference to a QoS profile."; } uses nw:network-ref; } grouping failure-detection-profile-reference { description "This grouping can be used to reference a failure detection profile."; leaf failure-detection-profile-ref { type leafref { path "/nw:networks/nw:network[nw:network-id=current()/../" + "network-ref]" + "/ac-ntw:specific-provisioning-profiles" + "/ac-ntw:valid-provider-identifiers" + "/ac-ntw:failure-detection-profile-identifier/ac-ntw:id"; require-instance false; } description "Type for an absolute reference to a failure detection profile."; } uses nw:network-ref; } grouping forwarding-profile-reference { description "This grouping can be used to reference a forwarding profile."; leaf forwarding-profile-ref { type leafref { path "/nw:networks/nw:network[nw:network-id=current()/../" + "network-ref]" + "/ac-ntw:specific-provisioning-profiles" + "/ac-ntw:valid-provider-identifiers" + "/ac-ntw:forwarding-profile-identifier/ac-ntw:id"; require-instance false; } description "A type for an absolute reference to a forwarding profile."; } uses nw:network-ref; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 52] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 } grouping routing-profile-reference { description "This grouping can be used to reference a routing profile."; leaf routing-profile-ref { type leafref { path "/nw:networks/nw:network[nw:network-id=current()/../" + "network-ref]" + "/ac-ntw:specific-provisioning-profiles" + "/ac-ntw:valid-provider-identifiers" + "/ac-ntw:routing-profile-identifier/ac-ntw:id"; require-instance false; } description "A type for an absolute reference to a routing profile."; } uses nw:network-ref; } // L2 conenction grouping l2-connection { description "Defines Layer 2 protocols and parameters that are required to enable AC connectivity."; container encapsulation { description "Container for Layer 2 encapsulation."; leaf encap-type { type identityref { base vpn-common:encapsulation-type; } description "Tagged interface type."; } container dot1q { when "derived-from-or-self(../encap-type, " + "'vpn-common:dot1q')" { description "Only applies when the type of the tagged interface is 'dot1q'."; } description "Tagged interface."; uses ac-common:dot1q; container tag-operations { description Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 53] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "Sets the tag manipulation policy for this AC. It defines a set of tag manipulations that allow for the insertion, removal, or rewriting of 802.1Q VLAN tags. These operations are indicated for the CE-PE direction. By default, tag operations are symmetric. As such, the reverse tag operation is assumed on the PE-CE direction."; choice op-choice { description "Selects the tag rewriting policy for an AC."; leaf pop { type empty; description "Pop the outer tag."; } leaf push { type empty; description "Pushes one or two tags defined by the tag-1 and tag-2 leaves. It is assumed that, absent any policy, the default value of 0 will be used for the PCP setting."; } leaf translate { type empty; description "Translates the outer tag to one or two tags. PCP bits are preserved."; } } leaf tag-1 { when 'not(../pop)'; type dot1q-types:vlanid; description "A first tag to be used for push or translate operations. This tag will be used as the outermost tag as a result of the tag operation."; } leaf tag-1-type { type dot1q-types:dot1q-tag-type; default "dot1q-types:s-vlan"; description "Specifies a specific 802.1Q tag type of tag-1."; } leaf tag-2 { when '(../translate)'; type dot1q-types:vlanid; description Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 54] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "A second tag to be used for translation."; } leaf tag-2-type { type dot1q-types:dot1q-tag-type; default "dot1q-types:c-vlan"; description "Specifies a specific 802.1Q tag type of tag-2."; } } } container priority-tagged { when "derived-from-or-self(../encap-type, " + "'vpn-common:priority-tagged')" { description "Only applies when the type of the tagged interface is 'priority-tagged'."; } description "Priority tagged container."; uses ac-common:priority-tagged; } container qinq { when "derived-from-or-self(../encap-type, " + "'vpn-common:qinq')" { description "Only applies when the type of the tagged interface is 'QinQ'."; } description "Includes QinQ parameters."; uses ac-common:qinq; container tag-operations { description "Sets the tag manipulation policy for this AC. It defines a set of tag manipulations that allow for the insertion, removal, or rewriting of 802.1Q VLAN tags. These operations are indicated for the CE-PE direction. By default, tag operations are symmetric. As such, the reverse tag operation is assumed on the PE-CE direction."; choice op-choice { description "Selects the tag rewriting policy for a AC."; leaf pop { type uint8 { range "1|2"; } description Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 55] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "Pops one or two tags as a function of the indicated pop value."; } leaf push { type empty; description "Pushes one or two tags defined by the tag-1 and tag-2 leaves. It is assumed that, absent any policy, the default value of 0 will be used for PCP setting."; } leaf translate { type uint8 { range "1|2"; } description "Translates one or two outer tags. PCP bits are preserved. The following operations are supported: - translate 1 with tag-1 leaf is provided: only the outermost tag is translated to the value in tag-1. - translate 2 with both tag-1 and tag-2 leaves are provided: both outer and inner tags are translated to the values in tag-1 and tag-2, respectively. - translate 2 with tag-1 leaf is provided: the outer tag is popped while the inner tag is translated to the value in tag-1."; } } leaf tag-1 { when 'not(../pop)'; type dot1q-types:vlanid; description "A first tag to be used for push or translate operations. This tag will be used as the outermost tag as a result of the tag operation."; } leaf tag-1-type { type dot1q-types:dot1q-tag-type; default "dot1q-types:s-vlan"; description "Specifies a specific 802.1Q tag type of tag-1."; } leaf tag-2 { when 'not(../pop)'; type dot1q-types:vlanid; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 56] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 description "A second tag to be used for push or translate operations."; } leaf tag-2-type { type dot1q-types:dot1q-tag-type; default "dot1q-types:c-vlan"; description "Specifies a specific 802.1Q tag type of tag-2."; } } } } choice l2-service { description "The Layer 2 connectivity service can be provided by indicating a pointer to an L2VPN or by specifying a Layer 2 tunnel service."; container l2-tunnel-service { description "Defines a Layer 2 tunnel termination."; uses ac-common:l2-tunnel-service; } case l2vpn { leaf l2vpn-id { type vpn-common:vpn-id; description "Indicates the L2VPN service associated with an Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB) interface."; } } } } grouping l2-connection-if-ref { description "Specifies Layer 2 connection paramters with interface references."; uses l2-connection; leaf l2-termination-point { type string; description "Specifies a reference to a local Layer 2 termination point, such as a Layer 2 sub-interface."; } leaf local-bridge-reference { type string; description Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 57] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "Specifies a local bridge reference to accommodate, e.g., implementations that require internal bridging. A reference may be a local bridge domain."; } leaf bearer-reference { if-feature "ac-common:server-assigned-reference"; type string; description "This is an internal reference for the service provider to identify the bearer associated with this AC."; } container lag-interface { if-feature "vpn-common:lag-interface"; description "Container for configuration of Link Aggregation Group (LAG) interface attributes."; leaf lag-interface-id { type string; description "LAG interface identifier."; } container member-link-list { description "Container for the member link list."; list member-link { key "name"; description "Member link."; leaf name { type string; description "Member link name."; } } } } } // IPv4 connection groupings grouping ipv4-connection { description "IPv4-specific parameters."; leaf local-address { type inet:ipv4-address; description "The IP address used at the provider's interface."; } Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 58] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 uses ac-common:ipv4-allocation-type; choice allocation-type { description "Choice of the IPv4 address allocation."; case dynamic { description "When the addresses are allocated by DHCP or other dynamic means local to the infrastructure."; choice address-assign { description "A choice for how IPv4 addresses are assigned."; case number { leaf number-of-dynamic-address { type uint16; description "Specifies the number of IP addresses to be assigned to the customer on this access."; } } case explicit { container customer-addresses { description "Container for customer addresses to be allocated using DHCP."; list address-pool { key "pool-id"; description "Describes IP addresses to be dyncamically allocated. When only 'start-address' is present, it represents a single address. When both 'start-address' and 'end-address' are specified, it implies a range inclusive of both addresses."; leaf pool-id { type string; description "A pool identifier for the address range from 'start-address' to 'end-address'."; } leaf start-address { type inet:ipv4-address; mandatory true; description "Indicates the first address in the pool."; } Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 59] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 leaf end-address { type inet:ipv4-address; description "Indicates the last address in the pool."; } } } } } choice provider-dhcp { description "Parameters related to DHCP-allocated addresses. IP addresses are allocated by DHCP, which is provided by the operator."; leaf dhcp-service-type { type enumeration { enum server { description "Local DHCP server."; } enum relay { description "Local DHCP relay. DHCP requests are relayed to a provider's server."; } } description "Indicates the type of DHCP service to be enabled on this access."; } choice service-type { description "Choice based on the DHCP service type."; case relay { description "Container for a list of the provider's DHCP servers (i.e., 'dhcp-service-type' is set to 'relay')."; leaf-list server-ip-address { type inet:ipv4-address; description "IPv4 addresses of the provider's DHCP server, for use by the local DHCP relay."; } } } } choice dhcp-relay { description Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 60] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "The DHCP relay is provided by the operator."; container customer-dhcp-servers { description "Container for a list of the customer's DHCP servers."; leaf-list server-ip-address { type inet:ipv4-address; description "IPv4 addresses of the customer's DHCP server."; } } } } case static-addresses { description "Lists the IPv4 addresses that are used."; list address { key "address-id"; ordered-by user; description "Lists the IPv4 addresses that are used. The first address of the list is the primary address of the connection."; leaf address-id { type string; description "An identifier of the static IPv4 address."; } leaf customer-address { type inet:ipv4-address; description "An IPv4 address of the customer side."; } uses failure-detection-profile-reference; } } } } grouping ipv6-connection { description "IPv6-specific parameters."; leaf local-address { type inet:ipv6-address; description "IPv6 address of the provider side."; } uses ac-common:ipv6-allocation-type; choice allocation-type { Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 61] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 description "Choice of the IPv6 address allocation."; case dynamic { description "When the addresses are allocated by DHCP or other dynamic means local to the infrastructure."; choice address-assign { description "A choice for how IPv6 addresses are assigned."; case number { leaf number-of-dynamic-address { type uint16; description "Specifies the number of IP addresses to be assigned to the customer on this access."; } } case explicit { container customer-addresses { description "Container for customer addresses to be allocated using DHCP."; list address-pool { key "pool-id"; description "Describes IP addresses to be dyncamically allocated. When only 'start-address' is present, it represents a single address. When both 'start-address' and 'end-address' are specified, it implies a range inclusive of both addresses."; leaf pool-id { type string; description "A pool identifier for the address range from 'start-address' to 'end-address'."; } leaf start-address { type inet:ipv6-address; mandatory true; description "Indicates the first address in the pool."; } leaf end-address { type inet:ipv6-address; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 62] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 description "Indicates the last address in the pool."; } } } } } choice provider-dhcp { description "Parameters related to DHCP-allocated addresses. IP addresses are allocated by DHCP, which is provided by the operator."; leaf dhcp-service-type { type enumeration { enum server { description "Local DHCP server."; } enum relay { description "Local DHCP relay. DHCP requests are relayed to a provider's server."; } } description "Indicates the type of DHCP service to be enabled on this access."; } choice service-type { description "Choice based on the DHCP service type."; case relay { description "Container for a list of the provider's DHCP servers (i.e., 'dhcp-service-type' is set to 'relay')."; leaf-list server-ip-address { type inet:ipv6-address; description "IPv6 addresses of the provider's DHCP server, for use by the local DHCP relay."; } } } } choice dhcp-relay { description "The DHCP relay is provided by the operator."; container customer-dhcp-servers { Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 63] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 description "Container for a list of the customer's DHCP servers."; leaf-list server-ip-address { type inet:ipv6-address; description "IPv6 addresses of the customer's DHCP server."; } } } } case static-addresses { description "Lists the IPv4 addresses that are used."; list address { key "address-id"; ordered-by user; description "Lists the IPv6 addresses that are used. The first address of the list is the primary address of the connection."; leaf address-id { type string; description "An identifier of the static IPv4 address."; } leaf customer-address { type inet:ipv6-address; description "An IPv6 address of the customer side."; } uses failure-detection-profile-reference; } } } } grouping ip-connection { description "Defines IP connection parameters."; leaf l3-termination-point { type string; description "Specifies a reference to a local Layer 3 termination point, such as a bridge domain interface."; } container ipv4 { if-feature "vpn-common:ipv4"; description Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 64] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "IPv4-specific parameters."; uses ipv4-connection; } container ipv6 { if-feature "vpn-common:ipv6"; description "IPv6-specific parameters."; uses ipv6-connection; } } /* Routing */ //BGP base parameters grouping bgp-base { description "Configuration specific to BGP."; leaf description { type string; description "Includes a description of the BGP session. This description is meant to be used for diagnostic purposes. The semantic of the description is local to an implementation."; } uses rt-pol:apply-policy-group; leaf local-as { type inet:as-number; description "Indicates a local AS Number (ASN), if an ASN distinct from the ASN configured at the AC level is needed."; } leaf peer-as { type inet:as-number; mandatory true; description "Indicates the customer's ASN when the customer requests BGP routing."; } leaf address-family { type identityref { base vpn-common:address-family; } description "This node contains the address families to be activated. 'dual-stack' means that both IPv4 and IPv6 will be activated."; } leaf role { Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 65] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 type identityref { base ac-common:bgp-role; } description "Specifies the BGP role (provider, customer, peer, etc.)."; } leaf multihop { type uint8; description "Describes the number of IP hops allowed between a given BGP neighbor and the PE."; } leaf as-override { type boolean; description "Defines whether ASN override is enabled, i.e., replacing the ASN of the customer specified in the AS_PATH attribute with the local ASN."; } leaf allow-own-as { type uint8; description "If set, specifies the maximum number of occurrences of the provider's ASN that are permitted within the AS_PATH before it is rejected."; } leaf prepend-global-as { type boolean; description "In some situations, the ASN that is provided at the node level may be distinct from the ASN configured at the AC. When such ASNs are provided, they are both prepended to the BGP route updates for this AC. To disable that behavior, 'prepend-global-as' must be set to 'false'. In such a case, the ASN that is provided at the node level is not prepended to the BGP route updates for this access."; } leaf send-default-route { type boolean; description "Defines whether default routes can be advertised to a peer. If set, the default routes are advertised to a peer."; } leaf site-of-origin { when "derived-from-or-self(../address-family, " + "'vpn-common:ipv4' or 'vpn-common:dual-stack')" { description "Only applies if IPv4 is activated."; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 66] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 } type rt-types:route-origin; description "The Site of Origin attribute is encoded as a Route Origin Extended Community. It is meant to uniquely identify the set of routes learned from a site via a particular AC and is used to prevent routing loops."; reference "RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), Section 7"; } leaf ipv6-site-of-origin { when "derived-from-or-self(../address-family, " + "'vpn-common:ipv6' or 'vpn-common:dual-stack')" { description "Only applies if IPv6 is activated."; } type rt-types:ipv6-route-origin; description "The IPv6 Site of Origin attribute is encoded as an IPv6 Route Origin Extended Community. It is meant to uniquely identify the set of routes learned from a site."; reference "RFC 5701: IPv6 Address Specific BGP Extended Community Attribute"; } list redistribute-connected { key "address-family"; description "Indicates, per address family, the policy to follow for connected routes."; leaf address-family { type identityref { base vpn-common:address-family; } description "Indicates the address family."; } leaf enabled { type boolean; description "Enables the redistribution of connected routes."; } } container bgp-max-prefix { description "Controls the behavior when a prefix maximum is reached."; leaf max-prefix { Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 67] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 type uint32; description "Indicates the maximum number of BGP prefixes allowed in the BGP session. It allows control of how many prefixes can be received from a neighbor. If the limit is exceeded, the action indicated in 'violate-action' will be followed."; reference "RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), Section 8.2.2"; } leaf warning-threshold { type decimal64 { fraction-digits 5; range "0..100"; } units "percent"; description "When this value is reached, a warning notification will be triggered."; } leaf violate-action { type enumeration { enum warning { description "Only a warning message is sent to the peer when the limit is exceeded."; } enum discard-extra-paths { description "Discards extra paths when the limit is exceeded."; } enum restart { description "The BGP session restarts after the indicated time interval."; } } description "If the BGP neighbor 'max-prefix' limit is reached, the action indicated in 'violate-action' will be followed."; } leaf restart-timer { type uint32; units "seconds"; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 68] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 description "Time interval after which the BGP session will be reestablished."; } } container bgp-timers { description "Includes two BGP timers."; leaf keepalive { type uint16 { range "0..21845"; } units "seconds"; description "This timer indicates the KEEPALIVE messages' frequency between a PE and a BGP peer. If set to '0', it indicates that KEEPALIVE messages are disabled. It is suggested that the maximum time between KEEPALIVE messages be one-third of the Hold Time interval."; reference "RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), Section 4.4"; } leaf hold-time { type uint16 { range "0 | 3..65535"; } units "seconds"; description "Indicates the maximum number of seconds that may elapse between the receipt of successive KEEPALIVE and/or UPDATE messages from the peer. The Hold Time must be either zero or at least three seconds."; reference "RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), Section 4.2"; } } list capability { key "address-family"; description "Customized set of BGP capabilities per address family."; leaf address-family { Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 69] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 type identityref { base vpn-common:address-family; } description "Indicates the address family."; } leaf name { type identityref { base ac-common:bgp-capability; } mandatory true; description "Indicates the name of BGP capability."; } } } grouping bgp-base-peer-group { description "Grouping for a basic BGP peer group."; leaf name { type string; description "Name of the BGP peer-group"; } uses bgp-base; } grouping bgp-base-peer-group-list { description "Grouping for a list of basic BGP peer groups."; list peer-group { key "name"; description "List of BGP peer groups uniquely identified by a name."; uses bgp-base-peer-group; } } grouping bgp-peer-group { description "Grouping for BGP peer group."; leaf name { type string; description "Name of the BGP peer-group"; } leaf local-address { Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 70] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 type union { type inet:ip-address; type if:interface-ref; } description "Sets the local IP address to use for the BGP transport session. This may be expressed as either an IP address or a reference to an interface."; } uses bgp-base; uses ac-common:bgp-authentication; } grouping bgp-peer-group-list { description "Grouping for a list of BGP peer groups."; list peer-group { key "name"; description "List of BGP peer groups uniquely identified by a name."; uses bgp-peer-group; } } // RIP base parameters grouping rip-base { description "Configuration specific to RIP routing."; leaf address-family { type identityref { base vpn-common:address-family; } description "Indicates whether IPv4, IPv6, or both address families are to be activated."; } container timers { description "Indicates the RIP timers."; reference "RFC 2080: RIPng for IPv6 RFC 2453: RIP Version 2"; leaf update-interval { type uint16 { range "1..32767"; } units "seconds"; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 71] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 description "Indicates the RIP update time, i.e., the amount of time for which RIP updates are sent."; } leaf invalid-interval { type uint16 { range "1..32767"; } units "seconds"; description "The interval before a route is declared invalid after no updates are received. This value is at least three times the value for the 'update-interval' argument."; } leaf holddown-interval { type uint16 { range "1..32767"; } units "seconds"; description "Specifies the interval before better routes are released."; } leaf flush-interval { type uint16 { range "1..32767"; } units "seconds"; description "Indicates the RIP flush timer, i.e., the amount of time that must elapse before a route is removed from the routing table."; } } leaf default-metric { type uint8 { range "0..16"; } description "Sets the default metric."; } } // routing profile grouping routing-profile { description "Defines routing protocols."; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 72] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 list routing-protocol { key "id"; description "List of routing protocols used on the AC."; leaf id { type string; description "Unique identifier for the routing protocol."; } leaf type { type identityref { base vpn-common:routing-protocol-type; } description "Type of routing protocol."; } container bgp { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:bgp-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is BGP."; } if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-bgp"; description "Configuration specific to BGP."; container peer-groups { description "Lists a set of BGP peer groups."; uses bgp-base-peer-group-list; } } container ospf { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:ospf-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is OSPF."; } if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-ospf"; description "Configuration specific to OSPF."; uses ac-common:ospf-basic; leaf max-lsa { type uint32 { range "1..4294967294"; } description "Maximum number of allowed Link State Advertisements (LSAs) that the OSPF instance will accept."; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 73] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 } leaf passive { type boolean; description "Enables when set to true a passive interface. It is active when set to false. A passive interface's prefix will be advertised, but no neighbor adjacencies will be formed on the interface."; } } container isis { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:isis-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is IS-IS."; } if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-isis"; description "Configuration specific to IS-IS."; uses ac-common:isis-basic; leaf level { type identityref { base vpn-common:isis-level; } description "Can be 'level-1', 'level-2', or 'level-1-2'."; reference "RFC 9181: A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPNs"; } leaf metric { type uint32 { range "0 .. 16777215"; } description "Metric of the AC. It is used in the routing state calculation and path selection."; } leaf passive { type boolean; description "When set to false, the interface is active. In such mode, the interface sends or receives IS-IS protocol control packets. When set to true, the interface is passive. That is, it suppresses the sending of IS-IS updates through the specified interface."; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 74] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 } } container rip { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:rip-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is RIP."; } if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-rip"; description "Configuration specific to RIP routing."; uses rip-base; } container vrrp { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:vrrp-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)."; } if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-vrrp"; description "Configuration specific to VRRP."; reference "RFC 9568: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6"; leaf address-family { type identityref { base vpn-common:address-family; } description "Indicates whether IPv4, IPv6, or both address families are to be enabled."; } leaf ping-reply { type boolean; description "Controls whether the VRRP speaker should reply to ping requests."; } } } } grouping routing { description "Defines routing protocols."; list routing-protocol { Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 75] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 key "id"; description "List of routing protocols used on the AC."; leaf id { type string; description "Unique identifier for the routing protocol."; } leaf type { type identityref { base vpn-common:routing-protocol-type; } description "Type of routing protocol."; } list routing-profile { key "routing-profile-ref"; description "Routing profiles."; uses routing-profile-reference; leaf type { type identityref { base vpn-common:ie-type; } description "Import, export, or both."; } } container static { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:static-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is a static routing protocol."; } description "Configuration specific to static routing."; container cascaded-lan-prefixes { description "LAN prefixes from the customer."; list ipv4-lan-prefix { if-feature "vpn-common:ipv4"; key "lan next-hop"; description "List of LAN prefixes for the site."; uses ac-common:ipv4-static-rtg-entry; uses bfd-routing; leaf preference { Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 76] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 type uint32; description "Indicates the preference associated with the static route."; } uses ac-common:service-status; } list ipv6-lan-prefix { if-feature "vpn-common:ipv6"; key "lan next-hop"; description "List of LAN prefixes for the site."; uses ac-common:ipv6-static-rtg-entry; uses bfd-routing; leaf preference { type uint32; description "Indicates the preference associated with the static route."; } uses ac-common:service-status; } } } container bgp { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:bgp-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is BGP."; } if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-bgp"; description "Configuration specific to BGP."; container peer-groups { description "Configuration for BGP peer-groups"; uses bgp-peer-group-list; } list neighbor { key "remote-address"; description "List of BGP neighbors."; leaf remote-address { type inet:ip-address; description "The remote IP address of this entry's BGP peer."; } leaf local-address { Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 77] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 type union { type inet:ip-address; type if:interface-ref; } description "Sets the local IP address to use for the BGP transport session. This may be expressed as either an IP address or a reference to an interface."; } leaf peer-group { type leafref { path "../../peer-groups/peer-group/name"; } description "The peer-group with which this neighbor is associated."; } uses bgp-base; uses bfd-routing; uses ac-common:bgp-authentication; uses ac-common:service-status; } } container ospf { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:ospf-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is OSPF."; } if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-ospf"; description "Configuration specific to OSPF."; uses ac-common:ospf-basic; container sham-links { if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-ospf-sham-link"; description "List of sham links."; reference "RFC 4577: OSPF as the Provider/Customer Edge Protocol for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), Section 4.2.7 RFC 6565: OSPFv3 as a Provider Edge to Customer Edge (PE-CE) Routing Protocol, Section 5"; list sham-link { key "target-site"; description "Creates a sham link with another Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 78] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 site."; leaf target-site { type string; description "Target site for the sham link connection. The site is referred to by its identifier."; } leaf metric { type uint16; description "Metric of the sham link. It is used in the routing state calculation and path selection."; reference "RFC 4577: OSPF as the Provider/Customer Edge Protocol for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), Section 4.2.7.3 RFC 6565: OSPFv3 as a Provider Edge to Customer Edge (PE-CE) Routing Protocol, Section 5.2"; } } } leaf max-lsa { type uint32 { range "1..4294967294"; } description "Maximum number of allowed Link State Advertisements (LSAs) that the OSPF instance will accept."; } leaf passive { type boolean; description "Enables when set to true a passive interface. It is active when set to false. A passive interface's prefix will be advertised, but no neighbor adjacencies will be formed on the interface."; } uses ac-common:ospf-authentication; uses ac-common:service-status; } container isis { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:isis-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is IS-IS."; } if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-isis"; description Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 79] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "Configuration specific to IS-IS."; uses ac-common:isis-basic; leaf level { type identityref { base vpn-common:isis-level; } description "Can be 'level-1', 'level-2', or 'level-1-2'."; reference "RFC 9181: A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPNs"; } leaf metric { type uint32 { range "0 .. 16777215"; } description "Metric of the AC. It is used in the routing state calculation and path selection."; } leaf passive { type boolean; description "When set to false, the interface is active. In such mode, the interface sends or receives IS-IS protocol control packets. When set to true, the interface is passive. That is, it suppresses the sending of IS-IS updates through the specified interface."; } uses ac-common:isis-authentication; uses ac-common:service-status; } container rip { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:rip-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is RIP. For IPv4, the model assumes that RIP version 2 is used."; } if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-rip"; description "Configuration specific to RIP routing."; uses rip-base; uses ac-common:rip-authentication; uses ac-common:service-status; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 80] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 } container vrrp { when "derived-from-or-self(../type, " + "'vpn-common:vrrp-routing')" { description "Only applies when the protocol is the VRRP."; } if-feature "vpn-common:rtg-vrrp"; description "Configuration specific to VRRP."; reference "RFC 9568: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6"; leaf address-family { type identityref { base vpn-common:address-family; } description "Indicates whether IPv4, IPv6, or both address families are to be enabled."; } leaf vrrp-group { type uint8 { range "1..255"; } description "Includes the VRRP group identifier."; } leaf backup-peer { type inet:ip-address; description "Indicates the IP address of the peer."; } leaf-list virtual-ip-address { type inet:ip-address; description "Virtual IP addresses for a single VRRP group."; reference "RFC 9568: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6, Sections 1.2 and 1.3"; } leaf priority { type uint8 { range "1..254"; } description Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 81] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "Sets the local priority of the VRRP speaker."; } leaf ping-reply { type boolean; description "Controls whether the VRRP speaker should reply to ping requests."; } uses ac-common:service-status; } } } // OAM grouping bfd { description "Grouping for BFD."; leaf session-type { type identityref { base vpn-common:bfd-session-type; } description "Specifies the BFD session type."; } leaf desired-min-tx-interval { type uint32; units "microseconds"; description "The minimum interval between transmissions of BFD Control packets, as desired by the operator."; reference "RFC 5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD), Section 6.8.7"; } leaf required-min-rx-interval { type uint32; units "microseconds"; description "The minimum interval between received BFD Control packets that the PE should support."; reference "RFC 5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD), Section 6.8.7"; } leaf local-multiplier { type uint8 { range "1..255"; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 82] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 } description "Specifies the detection multiplier that is transmitted to a BFD peer. The detection interval for the receiving BFD peer is calculated by multiplying the value of the negotiated transmission interval by the received detection multiplier value."; reference "RFC 5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD), Section 6.8.7"; } leaf holdtime { type uint32; units "milliseconds"; description "Expected BFD holdtime. The customer may impose some fixed values for the holdtime period if the provider allows the customer to use this function."; reference "RFC 5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD), Section 6.8.18"; } } grouping bfd-routing { description "Defines a basic BFD grouping for routing configuration."; container bfd { if-feature "vpn-common:bfd"; description "BFD control for this nighbor."; leaf enabled { type boolean; description "Enables BFD if set to true. BFD is disabled of set to false."; } uses failure-detection-profile-reference; } } // OAM grouping oam { Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 83] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 description "Defines the Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) mechanisms used."; container bfd { if-feature "vpn-common:bfd"; description "Container for BFD."; list session { key "dest-addr"; description "List of IP sessions."; leaf dest-addr { type inet:ip-address; description "IP address of the peer."; } leaf source-address { type union { type inet:ip-address; type if:interface-ref; } description "Sets the local IP address to use for the BFD session. This may be expressed as either an IP address or a reference to an interface."; } uses failure-detection-profile-reference; uses bfd; container authentication { presence "Enables BFD authentication"; description "Parameters for BFD authentication."; leaf key-chain { type key-chain:key-chain-ref; description "Name of the key chain."; } leaf meticulous { type boolean; description "Enables meticulous mode."; reference "RFC 5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD), Section 6.7"; } } uses ac-common:service-status; } Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 84] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 } } // security grouping security { description "Security parameters for an AC."; container encryption { if-feature "vpn-common:encryption"; description "Container for AC encryption."; leaf enabled { type boolean; description "If set to 'true', traffic encryption on the connection is required. Otherwise, it is disabled."; } leaf layer { when "../enabled = 'true'" { description "Included only when encryption is enabled."; } type enumeration { enum layer2 { description "Encryption occurs at Layer 2."; } enum layer3 { description "Encryption occurs at Layer 3. For example, IPsec may be used when a customer requests Layer 3 encryption."; } } description "Indicates the layer on which encryption is applied."; } } container encryption-profile { when "../encryption/enabled = 'true'" { description "Indicates the layer on which encryption is enabled."; } description "Container for the encryption profile."; choice profile { description Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 85] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "Choice for the encryption profile."; case provider-profile { uses encryption-profile-reference; } case customer-profile { leaf customer-key-chain { type key-chain:key-chain-ref; description "Customer-supplied key chain."; } } } } } // AC profile grouping ac-profile { description "Grouping for attachment circuit profiles."; container routing-protocols { description "Defines routing protocols."; uses routing-profile; } container oam { description "Defines the OAM mechanisms used for the AC profile."; container bfd { if-feature "vpn-common:bfd"; description "Container for BFD."; uses bfd; } } } // Parent and Child ACs grouping ac-hierarchy { description "Container for parent and child AC references."; container ac-parent-ref { description "Specifies the parent AC that is inherited by an AC. Parent ACs are used, e.g., in contexts where multiple CEs are terminating the same AC, but some specific information is required for each peer SAP."; Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 86] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 uses ac-ntw:attachment-circuit-reference; } container ac-child-ref { config false; description "Specifies a child AC that relies upon a parent AC."; uses ac-ntw:attachment-circuit-references; } } // AC network provisioning grouping ac { description "Grouping for attachment circuits."; leaf description { type string; description "Associates a description with an AC."; } container l2-connection { if-feature "ac-common:layer2-ac"; description "Defines Layer 2 protocols and parameters that are required to enable AC connectivity."; uses l2-connection-if-ref; } container ip-connection { if-feature "ac-common:layer3-ac"; description "Defines IP connection parameters."; uses ip-connection; } container routing-protocols { description "Defines routing protocols."; uses routing; } container oam { description "Defines the OAM mechanisms used for the AC."; uses oam; } container security { description "AC-specific security parameters."; uses security; } Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 87] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 container service { description "AC-specific bandwith parameters."; leaf mtu { type uint32; units "bytes"; description "Layer 2 MTU."; } uses ac-svc:bandwidth; container qos { if-feature "vpn-common:qos"; description "QoS configuration."; container qos-profiles { description "QoS profile configuration."; list qos-profile { key "qos-profile-ref"; description "Points to a QoS profile."; uses qos-profile-reference; leaf direction { type identityref { base vpn-common:qos-profile-direction; } description "The direction to which the QoS profile is applied."; } } } } container access-control-list { description "Container for the Access Control List (ACL)."; container acl-profiles { description "ACL profile configuration."; list acl-profile { key "forwarding-profile-ref"; description "Points to an ACL profile."; uses forwarding-profile-reference; } } } } Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 88] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network" { description "Add a list of profiles."; container specific-provisioning-profiles { description "Contains a set of valid profiles to reference in the AC activation."; uses ac-common:ac-profile-cfg; } list ac-profile { key "name"; description "Specifies a list of AC profiles."; leaf name { type string; description "Name of the AC."; } uses ac-ntw:ac-profile; } } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" { when '../nw:network-types/sap:sap-network' { description "Augmentation parameters apply only for SAP networks."; } description "Augments nodes with AC provisioning details."; list ac { key "name"; description "List of ACs."; leaf name { type string; description "A name that identifies the AC locally."; } leaf ac-svc-ref { type ac-svc:attachment-circuit-reference; description "A reference to the AC as exposed at the service level."; } list ac-profile { key "ac-profile-ref"; description Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 89] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "List of AC profiles."; uses ac-profile-reference; } uses ac-hierarchy; leaf-list peer-sap-id { type string; description "One or more peer SAPs can be indicated."; } uses ac-common:redundancy-group; uses ac-common:service-status; uses ac-ntw:ac; } } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" + "/sap:service/sap:sap" { when '../../../nw:network-types/sap:sap-network' { description "Augmentation parameters apply only for SAP networks."; } description "Augments SAPs with AC provisioning details."; list ac { key "ac-ref"; description "Specifies the ACs that are terminated by the SAP."; uses ac-ntw:attachment-circuit-reference; } } } 7. Security Considerations This section uses the template described in Section 3.7 of [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis]. The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC8446]. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 90] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content. There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) and delete operations to these data nodes without proper protection or authentication can have a negative effect on network operations. Specifically, the following subtrees and data nodes have particular sensitivities/vulnerabilities: 'specific-provisioning-profiles': This container includes a set of sensitive data that influence how an AC is delivered. For example, an attacker who has access to these data nodes may be able to manipulate routing policies, QoS policies, or encryption properties. These data nodes are defined with "nacm:default-deny- write" tagging [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac]. 'ac': An attacker who is able to access network nodes can undertake various attacks, such as modify the attributes of an AC (e.g., QoS, bandwidth, routing protocols, keying material), leading to malfunctioning of services that are delivered over that AC and therefore to Service Level Agreement (SLA) violations. In addition, an attacker could attempt to add a new AC. : In addition to using NACM to prevent unauthorized access, such activity can be detected by adequately monitoring and tracking network configuration changes. Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or notification) to these data nodes. Specifically, the following subtrees and data nodes have particular sensitivities/ vulnerabilities: 'ac': Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the identity of a customer 'peer-sap-id'. 'l2-connection' and 'ip-connection': An attacker can retrieve privacy-related information, which can be used to track a customer. Disclosing such information may be considered a violation of the customer-provider trust relationship. 'keying-material': An attacker can retrieve the cryptographic keys Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 91] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 protecting an AC (routing, in particular). These keys could be used to inject spoofed routing advertisements. Several data nodes ('bgp', 'ospf', 'isis', and 'rip') rely upon [RFC8177] for authentication purposes. As such, the AC network module inherits the security considerations discussed in Section 5 of [RFC8177]. Also, these data nodes support supplying explicit keys as strings in ASCII format. The use of keys in hexadecimal string format would afford greater key entropy with the same number of key- string octets. However, such a format is not included in this version of the AC network model, because it is not supported by the underlying device modules (e.g., [RFC8695]). 8. IANA Considerations IANA is requested to register the following URI in the "ns" subregistry within the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ac-ntw Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. IANA is requested to register the following YANG module in the "YANG Module Names" subregistry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters" registry: Name: ietf-ac-ntw Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ac-ntw Prefix: ac-ntw Maintained by IANA? N Reference: RFC XXXX 9. References 9.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit] Boucadair, M., Roberts, R., de Dios, O. G., Barguil, S., and B. Wu, "YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit- 15, 9 August 2024, . [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac] Boucadair, M., Roberts, R., de Dios, O. G., Barguil, S., and B. Wu, "A Common YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 92] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 opsawg-teas-common-ac-12, 24 July 2024, . [IEEE802.1Qcp] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks--Bridges and Bridged Networks--Amendment 30: YANG Data Model", September 2018, . [RFC2080] Malkin, G. and R. Minnear, "RIPng for IPv6", RFC 2080, DOI 10.17487/RFC2080, January 1997, . [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC2453] Malkin, G., "RIP Version 2", STD 56, RFC 2453, DOI 10.17487/RFC2453, November 1998, . [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006, . [RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February 2006, . [RFC4552] Gupta, M. and N. Melam, "Authentication/Confidentiality for OSPFv3", RFC 4552, DOI 10.17487/RFC4552, June 2006, . [RFC4577] Rosen, E., Psenak, P., and P. Pillay-Esnault, "OSPF as the Provider/Customer Edge Protocol for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4577, DOI 10.17487/RFC4577, June 2006, . [RFC5701] Rekhter, Y., "IPv6 Address Specific BGP Extended Community Attribute", RFC 5701, DOI 10.17487/RFC5701, November 2009, . Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 93] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 [RFC5709] Bhatia, M., Manral, V., Fanto, M., White, R., Barnes, M., Li, T., and R. Atkinson, "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication", RFC 5709, DOI 10.17487/RFC5709, October 2009, . [RFC5880] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010, . [RFC5925] Touch, J., Mankin, A., and R. Bonica, "The TCP Authentication Option", RFC 5925, DOI 10.17487/RFC5925, June 2010, . [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, . [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, . [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, . [RFC6565] Pillay-Esnault, P., Moyer, P., Doyle, J., Ertekin, E., and M. Lundberg, "OSPFv3 as a Provider Edge to Customer Edge (PE-CE) Routing Protocol", RFC 6565, DOI 10.17487/RFC6565, June 2012, . [RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, . [RFC7166] Bhatia, M., Manral, V., and A. Lindem, "Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3", RFC 7166, DOI 10.17487/RFC7166, March 2014, . [RFC7474] Bhatia, M., Hartman, S., Zhang, D., and A. Lindem, Ed., "Security Extension for OSPFv2 When Using Manual Key Management", RFC 7474, DOI 10.17487/RFC7474, April 2015, . Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 94] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, . [RFC8077] Martini, L., Ed. and G. Heron, Ed., "Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)", STD 84, RFC 8077, DOI 10.17487/RFC8077, February 2017, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC8177] Lindem, A., Ed., Qu, Y., Yeung, D., Chen, I., and J. Zhang, "YANG Data Model for Key Chains", RFC 8177, DOI 10.17487/RFC8177, June 2017, . [RFC8294] Liu, X., Qu, Y., Lindem, A., Hopps, C., and L. Berger, "Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area", RFC 8294, DOI 10.17487/RFC8294, December 2017, . [RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, . [RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018, . [RFC8343] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface Management", RFC 8343, DOI 10.17487/RFC8343, March 2018, . [RFC8345] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N., Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies", RFC 8345, DOI 10.17487/RFC8345, March 2018, . [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, . Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 95] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 [RFC9067] Qu, Y., Tantsura, J., Lindem, A., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy", RFC 9067, DOI 10.17487/RFC9067, October 2021, . [RFC9181] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., and Q. Wu, "A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9181, DOI 10.17487/RFC9181, February 2022, . [RFC9182] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., Munoz, L., and A. Aguado, "A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9182, DOI 10.17487/RFC9182, February 2022, . [RFC9291] Boucadair, M., Ed., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Barguil, S., and L. Munoz, "A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs", RFC 9291, DOI 10.17487/RFC9291, September 2022, . [RFC9408] Boucadair, M., Ed., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Barguil, S., Wu, Q., and V. Lopez, "A YANG Network Data Model for Service Attachment Points (SAPs)", RFC 9408, DOI 10.17487/RFC9408, June 2023, . [RFC9568] Lindem, A. and A. Dogra, "Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6", RFC 9568, DOI 10.17487/RFC9568, April 2024, . 9.2. Informative References [AC-Ntw-Tree] "Full Network Attachment Circuit Tree Structure", 2023, . [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis] Bierman, A., Boucadair, M., and Q. Wu, "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- netmod-rfc8407bis-14, 5 July 2024, . [I-D.ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue] Boucadair, M., Roberts, R., Barguil, S., and O. G. de Dios, "A YANG Data Model for Augmenting VPN Service and Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 96] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 Network Models with Attachment Circuits", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm- glue-10, 10 June 2024, . [PYANG] "pyang", 2023, . [RFC2918] Chen, E., "Route Refresh Capability for BGP-4", RFC 2918, DOI 10.17487/RFC2918, September 2000, . [RFC3644] Snir, Y., Ramberg, Y., Strassner, J., Cohen, R., and B. Moore, "Policy Quality of Service (QoS) Information Model", RFC 3644, DOI 10.17487/RFC3644, November 2003, . [RFC4862] Thomson, S., Narten, T., and T. Jinmei, "IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration", RFC 4862, DOI 10.17487/RFC4862, September 2007, . [RFC7665] Halpern, J., Ed. and C. Pignataro, Ed., "Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture", RFC 7665, DOI 10.17487/RFC7665, October 2015, . [RFC7880] Pignataro, C., Ward, D., Akiya, N., Bhatia, M., and S. Pallagatti, "Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD)", RFC 7880, DOI 10.17487/RFC7880, July 2016, . [RFC8299] Wu, Q., Ed., Litkowski, S., Tomotaki, L., and K. Ogaki, "YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery", RFC 8299, DOI 10.17487/RFC8299, January 2018, . [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, . [RFC8466] Wen, B., Fioccola, G., Ed., Xie, C., and L. Jalil, "A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery", RFC 8466, DOI 10.17487/RFC8466, October 2018, . Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 97] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 [RFC8695] Liu, X., Sarda, P., and V. Choudhary, "A YANG Data Model for the Routing Information Protocol (RIP)", RFC 8695, DOI 10.17487/RFC8695, February 2020, . [RFC8969] Wu, Q., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., Lopez, D., Xie, C., and L. Geng, "A Framework for Automating Service and Network Management with YANG", RFC 8969, DOI 10.17487/RFC8969, January 2021, . [RFC9127] Rahman, R., Ed., Zheng, L., Ed., Jethanandani, M., Ed., Pallagatti, S., and G. Mirsky, "YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)", RFC 9127, DOI 10.17487/RFC9127, October 2021, . [RFC9234] Azimov, A., Bogomazov, E., Bush, R., Patel, K., and K. Sriram, "Route Leak Prevention and Detection Using Roles in UPDATE and OPEN Messages", RFC 9234, DOI 10.17487/RFC9234, May 2022, . [RFC9543] Farrel, A., Ed., Drake, J., Ed., Rokui, R., Homma, S., Makhijani, K., Contreras, L., and J. Tantsura, "A Framework for Network Slices in Networks Built from IETF Technologies", RFC 9543, DOI 10.17487/RFC9543, March 2024, . Appendix A. Examples A.1. VPLS Let us consider the example depicted in Figure 20 with two customer terminating points (CE1 and CE2). Let us also assume that the bearers to attach these CEs to the provider network are already in place. References to the identify these bearers are shown in the figure. .-----. .--------------. .-----. .----. | PE1 +===+ +===+ PE2 | .----. | CE1+------+"450"| | MPLS | |"451"+------+ CE2| '----' ^ '-----' | | '-----' ^ '----' | | Core | | Bearer:1234 '--------------' Bearer:5678 Figure 20: Topology Example Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 98] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 The AC service model [I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit] can be used by the provider to manage and expose the ACs over existing bearers as shown in Figure 21. { "ietf-ac-svc:attachment-circuits": { "ac-group-profile": [ { "name": "an-ac-profile", "l2-connection": { "encapsulation": { "type": "ietf-vpn-common:dot1q", "dot1q": { "tag-type": "ietf-vpn-common:c-vlan", "cvlan-id": 550 } } }, "service": { "mtu": 1550, "svc-pe-to-ce-bandwidth": { "bandwidth": [ { "bw-type": "ietf-vpn-common:bw-per-port", "cir": "20480000" } ] }, "svc-ce-to-pe-bandwidth": { "bandwidth": [ { "bw-type": "ietf-vpn-common:bw-per-port", "cir": "20480000" } ] }, "qos": { "qos-profiles": { "qos-profile": [ { "profile": "QoS_Profile_A", "direction": "ietf-vpn-common:both" } ] } } } } Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 99] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 ], "ac": [ { "name": "ac-1", "description": "First attachment", "ac-group-profile": [ "an-ac-profile" ], "l2-connection": { "bearer-reference": "1234" } }, { "name": "ac-2", "description": "Second attachment", "ac-group-profile": [ "an-ac-profile" ], "l2-connection": { "bearer-reference": "5678" } } ] } } Figure 21: ACs Created Using ACaaS The provisioned AC at PE1 can be retrieved using the AC network model as depicted in Figure 22. A similar query can be used for the AC at PE2. { "ietf-ac-ntw:ac":[ { "name":"ac-11", "ac-svc-ref":"ac-1", "peer-sap-id":[ "ce-1" ], "status":{ "admin-status":{ "status":"ietf-vpn-common:admin-up" }, "oper-status":{ "status":"ietf-vpn-common:op-up" } }, Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 100] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "l2-connection":{ "encapsulation":{ "encap-type":"ietf-vpn-common:dot1q", "dot1q":{ "tag-type":"ietf-vpn-common:c-vlan", "cvlan-id":550 } }, "bearer-reference":"1234" }, "service":{ "mtu":1550, "svc-pe-to-ce-bandwidth":{ "bandwidth":[ { "bw-type": "ietf-vpn-common:bw-per-port", "cir":"20480000" } ] }, "svc-ce-to-pe-bandwidth":{ "bandwidth":[ { "bw-type": "ietf-vpn-common:bw-per-port", "cir":"20480000" } ] }, "qos":{ "qos-profiles":{ "qos-profile":[ { "qos-profile-ref":"QoS_Profile_A", "network-ref":"example:an-id", "direction":"ietf-vpn-common:both" } ] } } } } ] } Figure 22: Example of AC Network Response (Message Body) Also, the AC network model can be used to retrieve the list of SAPs to which the ACs are bound as shown in Figure 22. Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 101] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 { "ietf-sap-ntw:service":[ { "service-type":"ietf-vpn-common:vpls", "sap":[ { "sap-id":"sap#1", "peer-sap-id":[ "ce-1" ], "description":"A parent SAP", "attachment-interface":"GE0/6/1", "interface-type":"ietf-sap-ntw:phy", "role":"ietf-sap-ntw:uni", "allows-child-saps":true, "sap-status":{ "status":"ietf-vpn-common:op-up" } }, { "sap-id":"sap#11", "description":"A child SAP", "parent-termination-point":"GE0/6/4", "attachment-interface":"GE0/6/4.2", "interface-type":"ietf-sap-ntw:logical", "encapsulation-type":"ietf-vpn-common:vlan-type", "sap-status":{ "status":"ietf-vpn-common:op-up" }, "ietf-ac-ntw:ac":[ { "ac-ref":"ac-1", "node-ref":"example:pe2", "network-ref":"example:an-id" } ] } ] } ] } Figure 23: Example of AC Network Response to Retrieve the SAP (Message Body) Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 102] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 A.2. Parent AC In reference to the topology depicted in Figure 1, PE2 has a SAP which terminates an AC with two peer SAPs (CE2 and CE5). In order to control data that is specific to each of these peer SAPs over the same AC, child ACs can be instantiated as depicted in Figure 24. { "ietf-ac-ntw:ac":[ { "name":"ac-1", "peer-sap-id":[ "CE2", "CE5" ], "status":{ "admin-status":{ "status":"ietf-vpn-common:admin-up" }, "oper-status":{ "status":"ietf-vpn-common:op-up" } }, "l2-connection":{ "encapsulation":{ "encap-type":"ietf-vpn-common:dot1q", "dot1q":{ "tag-type":"ietf-vpn-common:c-vlan", "cvlan-id":550 } }, "bearer-reference":"1234" } }, { "name":"ac-1-to-ce2", "ac-parent-ref":{ "ac-ref":"ac-1", "node-ref":"example:pe2", "network-ref":"example:an-id" }, "peer-sap-id":[ "CE2" ] }, { "name":"ac-1-to-ce5", "ac-parent-ref":{ Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 103] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 "ac-ref":"ac-1", "node-ref":"example:pe2", "network-ref":"example:an-id" }, "peer-sap-id":[ "CE5" ] } ] } Figure 24: Example of Child ACs Figure 25 shows how to bind the parent AC to a SAP. { "ietf-sap-ntw:service":[ { "service-type":"ietf-vpn-common:l3vpn", "sap":[ { "sap-id":"sap#14587", "description":"A SAP", "parent-termination-point":"GE0/6/4", "attachment-interface":"GE0/6/4.2", "interface-type":"ietf-sap-ntw:logical", "encapsulation-type":"ietf-vpn-common:vlan-type", "sap-status":{ "status":"ietf-vpn-common:op-up" }, "ietf-ac-ntw:ac":[ { "ac-ref":"ac-1", "node-ref":"example:pe2", "network-ref":"example:an-id" } ] } ] } ] } Figure 25: Example of Binding Parent AC to SAPs Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 104] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 Acknowledgments This document builds on [RFC9182] and [RFC9291]. Thanks to Moti Morgenstern for the review and comments. Thanks to Martin Björklund for the yangdoctors review, Gyan Mishra for an early rtg-dir review, Joel Halpern for the rtg-dir review, and Giuseppe Fioccola for the ops-dir review. Thanks to Krzysztof Szarkowicz for the Shepherd review. Contributors Victor Lopez Nokia Email: victor.lopez@nokia.com Ivan Bykov Ribbon Communications Email: Ivan.Bykov@rbbn.com Qin Wu Huawei Email: bill.wu@huawei.com Ogaki Kenichi KDDI Email: ke-oogaki@kddi.com Luis Angel Munoz Vodafone Email: luis-angel.munoz@vodafone.com Authors' Addresses Mohamed Boucadair (editor) Orange Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Richard Roberts Juniper Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 105] Internet-Draft A YANG Network Model for ACs September 2024 Email: rroberts@juniper.net Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Telefonica Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com Samier Barguil Giraldo Nokia Email: samier.barguil_giraldo@nokia.com Bo Wu Huawei Technologies Email: lana.wubo@huawei.com Boucadair, et al. Expires 9 March 2025 [Page 106]